Posted on 05/08/2016 8:20:56 AM PDT by Zakeet
“What if he said she affirmatively said yes to further actions, but she says she didn’t?? Aren’t we then still back to square one on all of this???”
Absolutely! Unless the “couple” signs a “mutual consent” document in front of witnesses, all of this is BS. And even then it may not be enough.
“Triplicated...”
Sounds kinky. And complicated.
I can’t think of anything more conducisive to satisfying spontaneous sex than a checklist for both parties to initial.
I’m sure that some folks will be ablt to make money by merchandising lists such as “Sixty Nine Steps to Approval of Your Wildest Sexual Fantasies.” The Dummies Guide to Legal Sex Acts.
I’m not too clear on the concept of how to revoke a step that was approved more than one step earlier. Do you shout out “Step 7b is revoked.?” Or does a simple, “No” stop everything and you have to go back and start filling out a new consent form?
Not to worry. The Sex Police (a new division within HHS) will develop a set of government rules with thousands of pages which will be passed by our bureaucrats without oversight by Congress.
And remember folks, this form is require EVERY time you even think about sex with your partner, even if you have been married for many years.
Is my understanding that this law gives presumption to the accuser - obviously the female. So the guy will have to somehow prove he followed the law, and she doesn't have to prove anything.
Solution - college guys should find their girls outside of college. Let college girls sit alone. Stay the hell away!
Madness.
One wonders—being that affirmative verbal (or perhaps written, notarized) consent is required for each base attained on the way to the home run, is there also a required consent when re-running the bases backwards? For example, must addition consent be asked to kiss the young lady goodbye after a nice evening of Connecticut-approved sexual congress?
I also wonder if consent is required for each separate kiss, or if blanket waivers will be accepted? And, what if the question i”May I engage in Connecticut approved coitus with you, my dear?” receives an affirmative response, but the fellow, being gallant, kisses her in response. Has he broken the law by not seeking express kissing permission as well? Perhaps in the wisdom of the jury a kiss will be seen as a necessarily included act within the broad confines of ConnCoit. Only time and conviction stats will tell for sure.
These people are beyond insane. This is something that I’d expect from Oberlin College, not an actual legislature.
given the scalpel,they dissect a kiss;
I never kissed a conservative woman without knowing it was OK.
I also kissed my share of libtard girls. And they were not interested in consent. They were interested in feeling good.
I would hate to be back out “dating” again. What a nightmare.
Recording on a selfie can be awkward in some positions so I recommend a full monty video tape for each encounter. It can be transferred to a more permanent media for “hard core proof” should a lawsuit arise over consent(s) in the future.
How are you supposed to prove who said what? Do you have to sign consent forms and have them notarized with two witnesses at each step of the way? Is videotaping your encounter sufficient, as long as you have a signed and notarized consent form allowing the videotaping?
The White form ,Green form, and Blue form in carbonised harmony.
:)
The consent form covers the participant's preferred gender and gender pronouns and titles before names -- and like ID papers in every other two-bit dictatorship throughout the world and throughout history, has to be carried at all times. I suggest having custom t-shirts made, at least seven, one for each day of the week, to display a brief version of the details.
Connecticut seems like the perfect place to settle 100 percent of the muzzie 'refugees' from the Mideast and N Africa, and to resettle those being asked to leave Scandiinavia.
Or maybe a lot more guys will just go ahead and get their weiners whacked off —in frustration. By turning themselves into “women” at least they can claim to be “empowered.”
“...the law gives presumption to the accuser...”
Yes. Presumption of innocence, AKA innocent until proven guilty, is tossed. This has frightening implications for everyone, in every situation in which you might be the accused. It’s the logical trajectory of identity politics, designated victim classes, and hate crime legislation.
You can be utterly destroyed by false allegations, even claims that you committed some vaguely defined transgression years ago, and you can be hauled off to the gulag on a moment’s notice, simply because you belong to any of the designated oppressor classes—white, male, Christian, Republican, American, et al.
From sea to shining sea, the whole country seems to be becoming like a giant gulag. Much more efficient than building them one by one, just turn the whole place into a massive prison.
Law makers should be held to the same standard!!!!
The same commies always screeched about a right to privacy. Applies only to abortion.
Hahaha!! Great prose. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.