Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Turns to Kudlow, Moore to Rewrite Tax Plan. (Tweak)
Newsmax ^ | May 11, 2016

Posted on 05/11/2016 7:00:11 PM PDT by Hojczyk

Economist and CNBC host Kudlow tells Politico the changes he and Moore are recommending are just "tweaking" Trump's original plan, but the Tax Foundation now estimates those revisions would expand the deficit by $3.8 trillion.

"The full effect of all the things we talked about would have a very important reduction in the deficit," Kudlow tells Politico. "The economic growth would be increased, as would jobs and wages."

Trump's initial plan included eliminating federal income taxes for individuals making less than $25,000 and for married couples earning below $50,000, slashing the highest income tax rate from 39.6 percent to 25 percent and cutting the business tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent.

Some of those numbers could now shift, Kudlow tells Politico, adding, however: "Mr. Trump has not signed off on any of this."

Economist and CNBC host Kudlow tells Politico the changes he and Moore are recommending are just "tweaking" Trump's original plan, but the Tax Foundation now estimates those revisions would expand the deficit by $3.8 trillion.

"The full effect of all the things we talked about would have a very important reduction in the deficit," Kudlow tells Politico. "The economic growth would be increased, as would jobs and wages."

Trump's initial plan included eliminating federal income taxes for individuals making less than $25,000 and for married couples earning below $50,000, slashing the highest income tax rate from 39.6 percent to 25 percent and cutting the business tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent.

Some of those numbers could now shift, Kudlow tells Politico, adding, however: "Mr. Trump has not signed off on any of this."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Hojczyk

Meanwhile, Clinton turns to Lisa Kudrow and Michael Moore.


21 posted on 05/11/2016 7:45:55 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1

>>every citizen should pay taxes.

Not income tax. NO one should have to pay any income tax.

We the People were most prosperous when there was no income tax. There was no income tax from our nation’s beginning and for many years, until the commies instituted the PROGRESSIVE income tax, stripping much wealth from American citizens.


22 posted on 05/11/2016 7:48:19 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheana

So are we! Bad news. Mathematically, we are not “middle” anymore.
By a few dollars. State, Federal and Local 56%.
This Country needs an Enema!


23 posted on 05/11/2016 7:49:42 PM PDT by acapesket (all happy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Right-wing Librarian

I agree WW was a piece o crap.


24 posted on 05/11/2016 7:52:42 PM PDT by acapesket (all happy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Larry Kudlow has a radio show on WABC radio on Sunday morning. I have listened to his show for year’s and have never picked up that Larry was against Trump. He started out questioning the other guests about Trump early on but now he seems to supportive.
Larry Kudlow is a good person for Trump to pull in to the fold. He lives in Connecticut and was going to run for Governor a few times through the year’s.


25 posted on 05/11/2016 7:57:25 PM PDT by mojo114 (Pray for our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The 25% top rate should be sacrosanct. That was Coolidge’s top rate.

Though the REAL tax reform we need is repeal of the 16th Amendment.


26 posted on 05/11/2016 8:16:49 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1

Every citizen does pay a lot of taxes. Exorbitant taxes. Even the poor.

NO citizen should have to confront, naked and unarmed, the Federal Government.

That situation is what the 16th Amendment created.


27 posted on 05/11/2016 8:21:03 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojo114

“year’s”

Don’t look now, but your apostrophe is hanging out...


28 posted on 05/11/2016 8:24:55 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

National sales tax sounds about right.


29 posted on 05/11/2016 8:56:38 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Good idea....Excellent professional choices.


30 posted on 05/11/2016 10:25:50 PM PDT by MHT (,`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’d prefer Dave Ramsey’s ideology... get out of debt, stay out of debt.

Yes government is different, but not $19 trillion worth!!!

(waiting in a line... ask someone to write down 18 trillion... take it from there if you want)


31 posted on 05/11/2016 10:53:03 PM PDT by This_far (I'll match any NEW DONOR dollar for dollar (cllk my nik for the fine print))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

“...cutting the business tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent. “

‘bout time.

America should be the best place in the world to do business.

Like it used to be.>>>> the so called business tax that we pay should be zero. income tax repealed.


32 posted on 05/11/2016 10:53:24 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (gandolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Trump’s tax plan has brackets for Long Term Capital Gains. Instead of it being 15% for all income levels, it is 0% for Income up to $100K (Married), then 15% up to $300K and then 20% above $300K. Essentially, Trump’s plan allows investing tax free for people with income below $100K and raises the tax rate from 15% to 20% for those with incomes above $300K.

This addresses one of the complaints of wage earners — that the very wealthy pay a lower tax rate than they do because all their income comes from LTCG or other special classes of income.

It makes sense for people who are investing money they have already paid ordinary income tax rates on to pay a lower rate on their LTCG, but the wealthy whose only source of income is LTCG only ever pay the lower LTCG rate.

Does it really make sense for a wage earner to pay 25% on his marginal wages, invest it and then pay another 15% on his LTCG while a wealthy person pays only 15% on his income ?

LTCG are really a screwy way to tax someone when you are talking about the very wealthy whose only income is what they draw off their securities portfolios. Remember that LTCG are only taxed when realized — if you don’t sell securities, they can grow forever and never be taxed. If your portfolio goes up by a $1M but you only need to sell $200K in shares to live on, then you only pay 15% tax on $200K not $1M. Your effective tax rate can be just 3% — which is pretty tough to explain to that wage earner paying 20% or more overall on his wages. It feeds the meme that “the system is rigged” against the little guy.

I think Trump should ignore Kudlow and Moore on this LTCG tax rate “tweak”. They may think it benefits the economy to lower the LTCG rate for the very wealthy but it won’t make lower income people happy to see the wealthy paying a lower rate on their income than workers do on their wages.


33 posted on 05/12/2016 3:11:47 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Kudlow is someone the taxpayers should at least give a listen to.

Agreed - but..... do his predictions of expanding the deficit include spending as usual or a saner fiscal responsibility?

Glad to see that trump is turning to "specialists" as any good Exec would. Also glad that he had the plan that taxed the people the least of all the other plans as his "Alpha Test". Be pro-The People, means initial errs on the side of the People and tweaking only as necessary to insure stability.

34 posted on 05/12/2016 3:45:33 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
The counter point to that is that it costs more to process low income returns than the cash brought in.

So I guess one would have to balance the "skin in the game" advantage (whatever that is) against that processing cost.

35 posted on 05/12/2016 4:03:15 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

A 10% import tariff brings in $270 Billion and promotes domestic manufacturing. All good. 20% even better.


36 posted on 05/12/2016 4:19:15 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Cocaine Larry Kudlow, the man whose moral compass is set by the S&P futures. Not a good pick for Trump.


37 posted on 05/12/2016 5:39:52 AM PDT by Smokey Stover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson