Posted on 05/15/2016 5:31:53 AM PDT by reaganaut1
You hit the nail on the head. Most cannot afford insurance coverage that doesn’t bankrupt them when it is used. Conversely, the insurance coverage they can afford to purchase will bankrupt them if they attempt to use it. All most people are paying for is access to the insurance company’s network of contracted providers. That in and of itself is not worth the $1K or more a month for bare bones ‘coverage’.
______________________
Well of course! The agenda is to bankrupt people and take their assets. This is the tap for healthcare-government-insurance industrial complex into middle class assets, primarily homes.
They are after locked up assets.
I’m really not worried about it.
Yeah but don’t you want to screw them out of your hard earned stuff? You can leave all to something else instead, if you have no children.
Six adult kids. There is very little the state could take, though. But I feel worrying about that is like a German in 1944 worrying about what Hitler is gonna take in 1946. If you get my drift...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.