Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FBI may be looking at a violation of the Constitution in their Hillary investigation
americanthinker.com ^ | 5/16/2016 | Richard Henry Lee

Posted on 05/16/2016 7:21:23 AM PDT by rktman

Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution forbids office holders from accepting anything of value from a foreign state, yet husband Bill Clinton collected $1 million from the Abu Dhabi government while Hillary was secretary of state.

Bill Clinton spoke at the Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (AGEDI) on December 13, 2011 and received a speaking fee of $500,000. The AGEDI is a program funded by the Abu Dhabi government, so the source of the funds was the government itself. Although the fee was paid to Bill, Hillary equally benefited from the payment. In effect, she accepted money from a foreign state.

A year later, Bill spoke to the World Travel and Tourism Council in Abu Dhabi (also funded by the Abu Dhabi government) for another fee of $500,000, for a total of $1 million.

The U.S. Constitution provides in Section 9 as follows:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintoncrimefamily; clintonfoundation; clintongate; crooked; crookedhillary; elections; fbi; guilty; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; slushfund; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Should be: "FBI looking for work arounds for constitutional violations by the clintoon crime syndicate". Probably truer than not. RICO? Meh.
1 posted on 05/16/2016 7:21:23 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
"Bill Clinton collected $1 million from the Abu Dhabi government while Hillary was secretary of state."
2 posted on 05/16/2016 7:25:41 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hey, when you wade into the cesspool that is the Clintons’ finances, you are bound to encounter multiple felonies. Both of them should be in jail. LBJ and other prior presidents may have been more corrupt but the sheer audacity of the grand scale of Clintons’ corruption puts them in a class by themselves. They really are the most corrupt couple to have ever lived in the White House.


3 posted on 05/16/2016 7:27:27 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, bullying, dirty little snot.

Grab her by her collar. Walk her to the jail cell. Open the door. Throw her in the cell. Slam the door shut.


4 posted on 05/16/2016 7:28:09 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Of course it’s corrupt especially if you can link her to the payment, but I’m guessing the ban does not apply to your spouse because technically how could you prevent them from taking it?

Still sinks to the high heavens.


5 posted on 05/16/2016 7:29:54 AM PDT by Williams (Dear God please save us from the democrats. And the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Let’s add another more important one: Article III, Section 3, clause 1 -
Treason


6 posted on 05/16/2016 7:30:42 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Yeah, and they need to be slammed down hard because the Obama’s are probably planning the same charade.


7 posted on 05/16/2016 7:30:49 AM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Cattle futures, and some land speculation in the Whitewater estates years back, were very similar to this. It is what happens when you have nepotism, that is why Hillary should not have been allowed anywhere near policy or power as First Lady.


8 posted on 05/16/2016 7:31:27 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts (ROP.....Religion Of Peace, PTB......Powers That Be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
Grab her by her collar. Walk her to the jail cell. Open the door. Throw her in the cell. Slam the door shut. Throw away Key.
9 posted on 05/16/2016 7:32:38 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Of course any ethical Secretary of state would yell their spouse not to accept millions from foreign governments. Likewise any ethical presidential candidate.

I think the pink elephant in the room is Huma, a lesbian lover influencinging Hillary to favor the Muslim world, and setting her up for blackmail.


10 posted on 05/16/2016 7:32:47 AM PDT by Williams (Dear God please save us from the democrats. And the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

I think the point of why this is taking so long is this: if they put the crime family in jail, they would be at the head of the line that would go on for miles leading out of DC. The swamp would be so drained the city might actually rise a foot or two.

If Diogenes were seeking an honest man in DC with his oil lamp, he would need a super tanker to resupply the oil before he found one.


11 posted on 05/16/2016 7:33:24 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Do Presidential pardons apply to ALL crimes she’s committed, or does it have to be specific?


12 posted on 05/16/2016 7:34:02 AM PDT by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

If we could pick it, when would be the most opportune time for Hillary to be indicted? Not now, obviously, but what are the rules/laws regarding when a new candidate (Biden) could appear on ballots?


13 posted on 05/16/2016 7:34:16 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Yep—they are only “reportedly” “looking at” it in order to issue a clear-pass exoneration.


14 posted on 05/16/2016 7:34:48 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

this needs to be clarified.
thanks for the post.


15 posted on 05/16/2016 7:36:19 AM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

bttt


16 posted on 05/16/2016 7:36:37 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Williams

But doesn’t being married create a legal unity between the two persons? If that’s the case, then a gift to one is a gift to the other, yes?


17 posted on 05/16/2016 7:37:12 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Abu Dhabi is one of the emirates that comprises the United Arab Emirates. Technically not a “state”.

Once again, it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.


18 posted on 05/16/2016 7:37:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

There is an old Chinese saying that I think fits this situation.

“A journey of a thousand miles begins with a first step and the first step is to kick Hillary Clinton on her big, fat donkey to get her out of the way so everyone can move.”


19 posted on 05/16/2016 7:37:56 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
LBJ and other prior presidents may have been more corrupt

So far ... put the Hildebeast in the White Hut and see a new high in the level of corruption coming from the Oval office ... LBJ Nixon ..choir boys

20 posted on 05/16/2016 7:38:55 AM PDT by clamper1797 (We are getting close to the last "box")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson