Disagree - It's not insanity in the classic sense.
Every true follower of Allah is capable of, or approving of, this inhuman behavior.
Posted on 05/17/2016 9:08:27 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
she’s insane
She screamed “Allahu akbar” while brandishing the girl’s head and said that Allah had ordered her to behead the girl. She seems to have had an Islamic State boyfriend. She had become religious not long before the beheading, and started wearing hijab. She says the beheading was revenge for Russian airstrikes on Muslims in Syria. She told her son to pray five times a day and live in accord with Sharia.
Yes, this woman is clearly insane, just the way so very many Islamic jihad terrorists these days are insane. The establishment line is that Islamic jihad terror has nothing to do with Islam, and those who perpetrate it are simply crazy. The global outbreak of mental illness remains unexplained.
“‘Smirking’ Russian nanny who beheaded girl, 4, and paraded her head in the street will NOT face murder trial as she is ‘insane,'” by Will Stewart, MailOnline, May 13, 2016 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
The nanny who decapitated a girl, four, and paraded her severed head in the streets of Moscow will never face trial, say sources close to the criminal investigation.
Gyulchehra Bobokulova, 38, claimed she was inspired to kill the helpless child in a copycat of gruesome jihadist beheadings which she watched online.
She was trusted nanny to the girl she confessed to decapitating in north west Moscow – Anastasia Meshcheryakova – in a brutal act which caused shock around the world.
Earlier, the burka-clad babysitter had claimed that she killed the child on February 29 in revenge for Putin’s aerial bombardment of Muslims in Syria. She claimed she ordered by Allah to cut off the girl’s head.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I only read about it in The Daily Mail.
Disagree - It's not insanity in the classic sense.
Every true follower of Allah is capable of, or approving of, this inhuman behavior.
Well, I missed it altogether!
Another search shows a few more threads.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=Nanny
Perhaps it’s merely a cultural difference. What seems ‘insane’ to Westerners fits the culturally accepted in Islamic circles. So she’s NOT insane. She committed her crime in the West. When in Rome and all that .... Let her stand trial.
There’s a different way to look at this.
Crazy people ARE affected by the surrounding culture.
The manifestations of madness follow fads.
Back in the 19th-early 20th century it was a trope that madmen would imagine they were Napoleon, or a Napoleon-like character. This is no longer so it seems, because nobody remembers Napoleon.
I think it natural that crazy people would be affected by the modern popularity of Islamic terrorism. Also, I think, the whole transgender mania.
hahahah, I tend not to search for “Nannies Behead Four Year Olds”
impossible not to agree
that
Islam is Insanity
but this doesn’t solve the problem
Ah, so it was a video that caused her to do it. Where have we heard that before?
I don’t mean to imply that there aren’t perfectly (or at least functionally) sane terrorists. Most of them are of this kind. Fanatics can be sane by any useful definition of insanity.
But that there are also genuinely insane terrorists, who would have been insane in some other way at a different time.
Why on earth would anyone IN THEIR RIGHT MIND hire a muslim nanny?
Muslims from Central Asia in Russia are the equivalent of Mexicans here.
The only reason I can think of as to why she should not be trial is that she gets “shot while trying to escape”.
You’re right there. But anything bad about Muslims is covered up by the MSM.
>maybe she’ll experience a quick demise.
That would be a shame. This islamic gutter trash needs to suffer for a few decades under the harshest of conditions.
yep
Wow...for being such a dark and uber dangerous KGB agent, he sure is a noob with that pistol.
Islam is a mental disease.
Why is a right handed pistol shooter sighting down the barrel using his left eye? And why one eye?
My thought as well!
No. It was for revenge. Which never makes things right. It just feels good.
But it also brings to mind the old saying by Confucius, "Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.