Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's Electoral 'Luck'
American Thinker ^ | May 20, 2016 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 05/20/2016 10:24:03 AM PDT by Kaslin

The Clintons are notoriously corrupt. Their pathological mendacity reaches back over many decades. They lie; they cheat; they bribe; they threaten. Often the Clintons seem to have almost supernatural "luck" that defies the best house odds in Las Vegas.

Consider Hillary's "shrewd" investments as a virtual novice in the futures market. When Hillary entered the cattle futures market as the wife of the man who was set to become governor of Arkansas, she had virtually no experience or background in this very competitive and complex business. She was "lucky," wildly, beyond any reasonable probability analysis. How lucky? She turned an initial investment of $1,000 into a whopping $100,000 in less than one year.

The only reasonable explanation is that she had illegal help from folks who gave her "advice" and who were also major political contributors to the Clintons. Of course, wildly improbable luck is not evidence of crime, and so when evidence of this profoundly suspicious series of transactions came to public light during Bill's first term as president, nothing happened.

The whole history of the Clintons is one of incredible "luck," which stinks of something other than just good fortune. Bernie Sanders might want to consider how this has affected his run for the Democrat nomination against Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1968election; 2016demprimary; clinton; corruption; cpusa; crookedhillary; election1968; feelthebern; hillary2016

1 posted on 05/20/2016 10:24:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But has their “luck” started to run out?

Just wondering.


2 posted on 05/20/2016 10:38:40 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The crackup is beginning
3 posted on 05/20/2016 10:43:22 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, bullying, cheating, dirty little snot.


4 posted on 05/20/2016 10:43:47 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Like the six coin tosses in a row in Iowa.


5 posted on 05/20/2016 10:44:17 AM PDT by prof.h.mandingo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
EVERYONE from Hitler and Al Capone, to John Gotti, sooner or later run out of road. The Clintons are no exception

It's the "law of life."

6 posted on 05/20/2016 10:56:05 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Clintons serve one very useful purpose. When you see someone support the Clintons you know that person is either a fool or evil themselves. It helps me know who to avoid.

If I’m not sure about some person or group, I just ask my liberal Clinton loving relatives about that person or group. If the liberals hate them then I know the person or group is likely to be good. If the liberals like them then I know the people are likely to be scum.


7 posted on 05/20/2016 10:56:32 AM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand. If you are French raise both hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

So, so, SO reliably true!


8 posted on 05/20/2016 10:58:49 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I've always wondered why Hillary doesn't use her extraordinary commodities investing skill to raise large amounts of money to give to the poour.

By doing so, she would be a hero and also show how smart she is on an ongoing basis.

9 posted on 05/20/2016 10:58:50 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor

Oh, it goes a lot farther back in history


10 posted on 05/20/2016 12:32:51 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

of course she is lying. She’s a demonrat and they all lie


11 posted on 05/20/2016 12:34:05 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would use the term “preternatural” rather than “supernatural”.


12 posted on 05/20/2016 1:09:39 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit."-R.Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Oh, it goes a lot farther back in history

I hear ya.

But the era I mentioned covers enough "AGE" for me.. and you know what I mean.

13 posted on 05/20/2016 2:24:54 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson