Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

She said she violated the minimum age for driving the cart. Also, it sounds like they were heading back to a bungalow, which could have meant they were driving on the street—didn’t the story say it was a two block drive?

If it was on private land AND there was no prohibition on cart driving age, then there wouldn’t have been an issue.

Is it okay for me to put you at risk of a lawsuit because I want to ignore your prohibition?


58 posted on 05/22/2016 11:03:18 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

There’s a big difference between a statutory age requirement for driving a cart and a prohibition on it for insurance purposes.


76 posted on 05/22/2016 11:45:49 AM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

“She said she violated the minimum age for driving the cart.”

Fair enough, but I still think the reaction by the cops was excessive. A quick citation would have done the trick.

Now, maybe there’s more to the story, and I’m reasoning with incomplete data. Happens often with stories like these.


98 posted on 05/22/2016 1:54:26 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson