Mark Levin Show M-F 6PM-9PM EDT WABC AM June 6-10,2016

Mark Levin Show ^ | June 6, 2016 | Mark Levin

[Biggirl]

WELCOME Mark Levin!

yHello! He's Here In The Non-Descript Building and In The Hidden Bunker! Patriots, grab a comfy seat around the fireplace, warm your bones, grab a copy of The US Constitution, and select from Mark's Books which are on the shelves; help yourself and follow along for the next 3 hours, while we all educate each other and set the call-in libtards straight about their idiocy and treason. Also, help yourself to the Cheeseburger/Fries and Milk Duds 'buffet' and non-alcoholic drinks which Mark's graciously provided. And don't feed Barney any of that stuff!

[Biggirl]

[Canedawg]

Hey mark, still feeling butt hurt over cruz losing?

Cick.

[hotsteppa]

Click.

[TomGuy]

Levin says Trump’s opposition in the primaries got more votes than in any primary in history.

That is an outright lie!

Trump did get the most in history with 13,498,566.

Cruz only received 7,729,529
Kasich 4,201,708
Rubio 3,513,387

[TomGuy]

Mark, if the delegates revolt and dump Trump at the convention, NO OTHER REPUBLICAN would get enough votes in the general election to matter.

The Trump supporters are not going to rush to Jbush or Romney3peatloser or Ryan, and the revolution will make sure Cruz does not even get near the nomination. That revolution will hand the nomination to Clinton, and she won’t even have to show up for the presidential debates.

ADDITIONALLY, it will run down the tickets and will likely return the Senate to Democrats, and the House to the Dems by 2018, and give Clinton up to 4 Supreme Court seats.

[Biggirl]

I listened for a few minutes and I had to change stations. Goiing forward it will be all sports.

I caught Mark Levin in a lie. Frankly I am very disapointed with him tonight.

I will on Monday start to give on the Rush thread the awards again. Right now I am not sure in regards to Mark.

[Biggirl]

People will be very outraged if Mr. Trump is dumped. I know I will be myself.

[TomGuy]

30 minutes of quick research turned up these numbers for GOP primaries and major contenders since 1976:

2016 Primaries

Trump got 13,498,566 - the most EVER in GOP history.
Cruz got 7,729,529
Kasich got 4,201,708
Rubio got 3,513,387

2012 Primaries

Romney got 9,947,433
Santorum got 3,816,110
Gingrich got 2,689,771

2008 Primaries

McCain got 9,902,797
Huckabee got 4,276,046
Romney got 4,699,788

2004 Bush incumbent

2000 Primaries

Bush got 12,034,676
McCain got 6,061,332
Keyes got 985,819

1996 Primaries

Dole got 9,924,742
Buchanan got 3,184,943
Forbes got 1,751,187

1992 Bush incumbent

Bush got 9,199,463
Buchanan got 2,899,488

1988

Bush 8,253,512
Dole 2,333,375
Robertson 1,097,446

1984 Reagan incumbent

1980

Reagan got 7,709,793
Bush got 3,070,033
Anderson got 1,572,174

1976

Ford got 5,529,899
Reagan got 4,760,222

[chris37]

I’m sure that Mark Latrine is trying to argue that only two people were running in this primary.

Trump and Trump’s opposition.

I’m sure that he is tallying all of Cruzkasichrubio’s votes as if they were one person and saying that person, who is not Trump, got more votes than Trump.

It’s kind of the same way he argued in a few of the various primaries that if X had left the race earlier, then all of X’s votes would have gone to Cruz, and Cruz would have defeated Trump in that primary.

This, among a number of other reasons, is why I stopped listening to this fool.

Mark Levin has become dishonest.

[stratboy]

Latrine won't come around. And to be quite honest, it is to late. Since he doesn't want Trump to win, one can correctly assume that he is on team Clinton and should be treated no different that any other liberal main stream media personality.

It was a hard concept for me to accept, being a former 6 year listener and buying into most of his lies, cons, and far-fetched ideas. But I have now realized that his show is (in his own words) is a potemkin village consisting of a conservative facade with nothing behind it. He successfully convinced many of us that he is a conservative scholar of the constitution. But when I looked, I haven't found a case in which he was in-court arguing. At least Cruz can brag about arguing front of the USSC.

I vividly remember the times he said that it was okay to vote for Romney. Same thing for McCain. He even endorsed Hatch. I remember him saying that we need to keep the democrats out and that he would do anything in his power to make that happen. He even went so far as to berate anyone who wanted to go 3rd party.

After his constant bashing of Trump, I stopped listening in January. I had hoped that he would come around after his good buddy dropped out. What I have realized is that he won't. He is nothing more than a carnival barking, bitter, intellectual lightweight.

He is also who is out of his league in most areas he engages in on his show. Because he graduated early from college, he regards himself as an expert on the budget, trade, and tax reform. He often drops names of conservative philosophers in a weak attempt to demonstrate his constitutional bonafides (that and to convince people to buy his fantasy books).

Good riddance. Maybe Team Clinton can buy his fiction works.

[CASchack]

I had him on briefly tonight and didn't last five minutes. Now it's "Trump can't win Kansas!" Well, Trump beat all of Mark's favored candidates. He's really lost his bearings, IMO. He reminds me of Homer Simpson's crackup over having the Flaming Moe recipe stolen from him.

[conservative98]

Mark also says Trump only got 40 something % (actual 44.3%) of the primary vote heading into the general and Reagan got nearly 60% (actual 59.8%).

What he fails to mention is that he was going up against 17 candiates. Reagan only went up against 7. Can we stop with the 40% crap when you know the vote was being split 17 ways??????? We are well aware of that! 40+ percent with 17 candidates is excellent!

Also can we stop with Trump is not going to win California, New York and New Jersey? Maybe he won’t. But you are souring the vote. We were winning NJ from the 1970s until Bush starting the losing streak in 1992. Nobody says Trump will win these states but he does put New York and New Jersey in play and Cruz does not.

[Gene Eric]

I occasionally tune into 770 AM, New York now anticipating the disappointment that never existed months ago.

Guessing it was about 8:30 EST this evening. A woman calls in describing her dismay with Clinton. Levin responds dismissively stating we all know the vapid idiot she is, but then changes the subject to Trump — the mysterious nominee that has no track record on anything... blah, blah, blah. So is Levin betting on the devil you know? Well, Bob Grant would certainly be displeased.

Yo, advertisers... I’m not tuning into 770 AM between 6 & 9 PM. I’d rather listen to NPR (puke.)

Seriously, Levin — get the # off my radio!!!