These people can go F themselves, no offense do we need to hear more about them today on FR, getting sick of Islamists and what they do not like.
Sharia Is Better Than freedom
BULLSHIT!
>>Muslim Immigrants To America: Sharia Is Better Than freedom
Fine. Let’s build some camps in a remote place like....ummm...Guantanamo and put them there. Be as sharia compliant as you want. Problem solved.
Immigrants need to sign a loyalty oath renouncing Sharia law and not to promote any other fundamental replacement of American federal, state, local and civil law.
Nuking Mecca is better than not nuking Mecca.
dead mooselimbs are better than sharia
Jihadists believe that they will soon get their promised 72 virgins, etc. So they are happy.
Sick of this new generation of immigrants who, unlike earlier waves of immigrants, want to bring the systems of the hellholes from which they fled to the USA. Sharia-loving Muzz and Mexican-flag-waving Mexicanos come to mind.
If “Sharia Is Better Than freedom”, then go to some middle east hell hole where it is practiced and leave my country alone.
Why are hordes of Muslims coming to America?
To acquire Freedom or to impose Sharia?
Take that sharia crap back to your native pile of rocks and ignorance.
Then leave.
Vigilantism cannot be far off! The toleration limit for these cretins is long past!
And, therefore, it is better than the Constitution. Revive HUAC and identify and expel all those who are dedicated to the overthrow of our constitutional system by force and violence. That is to say, they must agree that Sharia is inseparable from the idea of killing for your psuedo god and give it up or pack up and go.
Then they should pack their bags and back to where they were spawned.
Like hell. They have to be kicked out!
Any Muslim who doesn’t want to live under Islamic law would be considered apostate. Asking them if they prefer it over any other law or political system is asking what should be obvious.
Yet non-Muslims by in large do not appear to understand this, especially so-called “progressives”, nor do many understand how Islam itself is precisely the problem ... and not just because it is of the spirit of antichrist but because of abrogation and the consequences of this central fact about Mohammad’s teachings.
Mohammad, to be blunt, made things up as he went along. When he was weak he was all peace and harmony but once he was stronger his bloodthirsty narcissistic self came to the fore. He was to have even been asked about the radical changes. Abrogation is the doctrine that results. To reference the peaceful passages and dismiss the violent, as many non-Muslims do, is to miss Islam entirely.
That doesn’t mean that Muslims have to be violent, though. At issue is the same thing Mohammad faced: that there are times when being militant isn’t either practical or, more telling for many Muslims, considered appropriate. For many Muslims whose views on Sharia do not differ from the militants what they consider appropriate to their circumstances and, yes, even what they desire, is very different than what the militants deem proper.
This has been described in term of comparisons to one of three phases of Mohammad’s career. The first Meccan phase is peaceful. The Medinan less so, and then in the second Meccan phase it is outright violent.
So look again at the folks in the video: here you have people who obviously believe that being peaceful is appropriate ... yet some of their neighbors, presumably once like them, have been convinced that the violent way is proper. It need not be, and indeed probably isn’t, the case that these two groups differ on Islamic law.
So what makes being violent appropriate? Look again at Mohammad’s career: bring relatively strong. Or perchance your adversary being as weak as they are likely to get (appeasement makes militant behavior and violence more likely, not less).
ISIL is doing what it can to inspire Muslims to get out of the first Meccan phase just as AQ, in its magazine, was to have chided the Muslim Brotherhood for being still in the Medinan phase. When they succeed terrorists etc happen.
And they brought the money to lobby for it. That’s why our business, academic and political leaders are so much on their side.
Between 2001 and 2013, the U.S. permanently resettled nearly 30,000 Afghan migrants on green cards. According to Pew, nearly all Muslims in Afghanistan (99%) support sharia law as official law.
Any Muslim attempting to immigrate to the US who believes that Sharia Law is equal or higher than the US Constitution should NOT be allowed into this country. In America it is the Constitution and Federal/State/Local law that rules, NOT SHARIA!
IF that is true why did you leave your muslim country?
Whatever is going on there is under sharia, and its also the “will of allah”.
Time to ship them all back.
Trump better have a plan to send back all the ones Obama is bringing in.
Not sh1tting. We need to get them out of the country.
And we need to destroy the myth that diversity is strength.
It depends on what you mean by diversity.