[Pinkbell]

I believe in freedom of the press, but the Washington Post deserves this. They are not objective. They currently have a team of 24 reporters working on basically destroying Trump. They churn out hit pieces like a baker bakes up cookies. Their articles are either full on hit pieces or Trump taken out of context to be dishonest. I wouldn't care about the former if they did hit pieces like that on Hillary, but they don't. One day, I went to their politics section and counted 9 negative articles on Trump to 1 on Hillary. The Washington Post is another Huffington Post.

[miss marmelstein]

Good! Followed by the NY Times, The NY Daily News, The Telegraph and The Guardian.

[Travis McGee]

[HarleyLady27]

WOOHOO GO. TRUMP!!!

[UKrepublican]

He has guts. If you lot don’t elect him, the West is finished.

[Kriggerel]

Only difference between WaPo and HuffPo is that WaPo still OCCASIONALLY publishes an actual article.

Not so with HuffPo. HuffPo long ago moved into the business of exclusively publishing sharticles.

[Helicondelta]

The Washington Post reads like the onion these days.

They are too dumb to even do proper hit pieces.

[Cheerio]

Yahoo - that one single action would guarantee my vote for the TRUMPSTER.

[COUNTrecount]

Already posted.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index

[tumblindice]

Compost, you been Meghyned! Go Trump!

[Angels27]

Not sure if this is a good. It could only lead to even more inaccurate reporting on Trump by the Compost.

[SaveFerris]

Bye bye, Washington Compost.

[Mark]

“NO POST, NO PEACE!”, scream the 4th graders at a public school near you.

[lesko]

FINALLY someone with balls

[Zarro]

Sweet! Shut ‘em down! It’s not like anyone believes what they write, anyway...

[Mr. K]

LOL!!

Why give them free passes to get in and then lie about you?

[Pinkbell]

Here’s why, everyone:

“I am no fan of President Obama, but to show you how dishonest the phony Washington Post is, they wrote, “Donald Trump suggests President Obama was involved with Orlando shooting” as their headline. Sad!”

~Trump

[trisham]

I’d like to know what despicable coward added the keyword “thin skinned”.

[Steamburg]

I doubt this could worsen the tone of the WAPO. I doubt that the ban will last much longer than the HuffPO ban on Donald. That said, there’s nothing like poking the hornet’s nest to get free coverage. When they go into a rabid, slobbering, hisseyfit, Trump wins both in coverage and in discrediting their attacks. Obama simply demanded that they give him pre-approval on all publication. This is the next best thing.

[DollyCali]

Good. They can get their coverage from CNN

Fifth column consequences long overdue

[djstex]

I just read this on Trump’s Website! GO TRUMP!