Posted on 06/17/2016 8:09:00 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Several weeks before he massacred 49 at an Orlando gay nightclub, Muslim terrorist Omar Seddique Mateen transferred over his interest in his Florida home to his older sister and Afghan brother-in-law, property records show an indication the family possibly had some knowledge of his martyrdom plans.
Authorities say the fatally shot Mateen clearly was prepared to die in a gun battle with police during the June 12 attack, the deadliest act of terrorism on U.S. soil since 9/11.
On April 5, Mateen quit-claimed the deed on his Port St. Lucie, Fla., house, signing it over to his sister, Sabrina Abasin, and his brother-in-law Mustafa Abasin for just $10 according to county property records. The records list his wife Noor Salman as a witness in the curious real estate transaction.
Mateens wife, who is expected to be charged as an accessory in her husbands attack, reportedly has told authorities Mateen began casing targets as early as April. He was regularly training with firearms well before April.
Earlier this week, the mysterious brother-in-law Mustafa Abasin, aka Mustafa Aurakzai escorted the widowed Salman, who wore a hoodie to shield her face from cameras, to the Port St. Lucie home to collect belongings. Florida state records indicate he was born in Afghanistan.
The 43-year-old Abasin has been questioned by federal investigators. In fact, the entire family is under investigation. FBI agents have expanded the investigation overseas to include family connections in Afghanistan.
Abasin is listed on state articles of incorporation papers as a founding director of a pro-Taliban nonprofit group set up by Mateens father, Seddique Mir Mateen. Abasins wife, Sabrina Seddique Abasin, also sits on its board.
An Afghan immigrant, the senior Mateen founded the The Durand Jirga Inc. in 2010 to support the Taliban and the tribal region
(Excerpt) Read more at counterjihad.com ...
“Can you sign over a deed if it has a mortgage?”
Sure. All a quitclaim deed does is, “Whatever I own in this property, it’s yours.” No warranties.
Of course the mortgagee is going to get involved since the mortgage loan and promissory note was based on the credit-worthiness of the mortgagor.
Thank you
And there is no satisfaction of mortgage recorded on Mateen’s original mortgage taken out in 2013 for $76,000.
You are most welcome.
Well put. Not a home grown lone wolf as Obama wants everyone to believe
You forgot the sarcasm tag.
Was this other house a meeting place for his cell?
it is my relatively uninformed impression that the mortgagee (lender/bank) holds the title until the mortgage is paid, upon which a deed is issued transferring title from the mortgagee to the former mortgagor (borrower), survivor, or whoever. it is my impression that you do not own the property until you possess the title to it, in your name. a deed is just a legal instrument that transfers property ownership realized in the form of a title from one entity to another. (i would welcome a more informed opinion.)
On 09-11-2013
3557/2723 -- Property purchased for $95,000 in 3 names: Omar, his sister Miriam, and father Seddique
3557/2726 -- Mortgage for $76,000 from Seacoast National Bank in 4 names: Omar, his wife Noor Salman, sister Miriam, and father Seddique
On 4-20-2015, 3 separate quitclaim deeds to Omar's brother in law:
3859/1053 from sister Miriam
3859/1054 from father Seddique
3859/1055 from Omar himself
There is no recording of a satisfaction of the original $76,000 mortgage.
proofreading apparently not my top skill
And when I express that, people think I am intolerant or insane.
Ye.. all moosleems...
“you cant sign over a deed if there is any kind of mortgage or lien on it.”
I transferred my property into a trust while there was still a mortgage????????????????
.
what does this have to do with Obamacare?
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.