LYNCH: No, this is not a conflict for me and for the department or for anyone. We will continue to do all of our work in the same language we always have, with the interest of the American people first and foremost.
WALLACE: Now, the same day that Clinton was endorsed by the president, you met with the president at the White House. Did you in any way, shape or form discuss the Clinton case with the president?
LYNCH: Weve never discussed the Clinton case. I have never spoken about it with the president or really with anyone at the White House. That's not the kind of relationship that I have with people there and it would be inappropriate to do so.
WALLACE: Attorney General Lynch, thank you. Thanks for your time today.
(Bold emphasis added above.)
SERKIT COMMENTS:
Like the Obama regime, and especially the Clintons method of messaging, parsing is required to get through the obfuscation. Based on Lynch's comments, she is more interesting in "language" than the law, and places heavy emphasis in the "interest of the American people first and foremost" - however the Regime interprets that phrase.
The bottom line here is that Loretta Lynch needs to be asked a fairly simple question:
If the FBI investigators bring a criminal case against Mrs Clinton to the DoJ, citing that Mrs Clinton broke one or more laws related to her failure to "take care" of public documents or avoidance of national security breaches, which she was sworn to do, admitted she failed to do, and has publicly apologized for, will the DoJ follow the law, or be influenced by the "interest of the American people first and foremost", meaning, the President's endorsement of Mrs Clinton trumps the rule of law and the case will be quashed? (We can't have Trump!)
She will absolutely follow the law...
...any time following the law suits the Agenda.
Sure she will.........as she interprets it......
Yes.
sharia law
The interest of the American people is subjective. The rule of law is not. Not the same thing, Loretta.
Uh, No.
“the interest of the American people first and foremost” == no obstacles to Hillary being elected
Might as well ask - Will Hillary drop 50 pounds of ugly fat by Thursday?
loretta lynch is a smooth-talking liar. But, foremost, a liar.
Look how quickly decisions were made by here w/respect to what and what won’t be provided in the transcript of the ISIS killer in Orlando. The Justice Dept can move very quickly when it suits THIS Admins needs.
Duh!
What we actually can see is how corrupt our government really is....and...what an apt lair Loretta Lynch is. Ms. Lynch and Obama will place Hillary...
I'll take rhetorical questions for $200, Alex.
Refuges have killed so much of America now and it will continue with a huge influx.
Trump for President. Only chance since the GOPe is one of King Obama’s army.
GRRRRREAT posts BUMP!
Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim when he defends himself as a criminal.
You would use the law to oppose socialism? But it is upon the law that socialism itself relies. Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help.
“The Law” - Frederic Bastiat
Surely this question is asked in jest.
Lynch will not follow the law.
She just stated that she was going to use post modern relativity in her investigation, not the rule of law.
Why would she start now?