So, all they did there on CNN is attempt to get Corey to badmouth Trump and/or his family and/or other campaign people. The Russians say that they have about 35,000 of her emails, and Guciffer said that he hacked into her sever several times, and Wikileaks also say that they have 30,000 or more of her emails. Corey should have turned around and asked if all 3 of these sources have been discredited, because I don’t think any of them have been.
Corey did fine on this.
I would really, really like to know from the “no proof” crowd. just what form of “proof” would they find acceptable? There is never the slightest discussion as to what would constitute proof. Suppose your identity is hacked and someone gets hold of your credit card. Do they send you a receipt? The comment is utterly absurd on its face.
The proof is in fact a negative proof. HRC NEVER acquired nor was assigned a government email address. She ONLY used her personal address. Therefore, unless you are ready to assert that EACH and EVERY email message she rec’d while serving as SOS was UNclassified, there is no possible conclusion that ALL, EVERY SINGLE ONE or her messages was placed on an unsecure server. Any one of those is a black letter violation of 18 USC and the espionage act. There are over 1300 of those at last count.
A receipt? As in “received today.....39,293 emails from email server with MAC address ______________ located Denver, Broomfield, CO, USA, and transferred to email server with MAC address ___________ located Beijing, Peoples Republic of China? dated _____
A Hallmark greeting card “We greatly appreciate your cooperation in allowing your email correspondence to reside on server _______ where we have been able to access and download your entire volume of correspondence during your term as SOS under the 0bama administration”?
Or; “congratulations, you are the 100,000th email user we have hacked, per the terms of our sweepstakes, you are entitled to enter our drawing for a vacation for the duration you choose in your choice of:
A: 3 days and nights in Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
B: 1 week (7 days and nights) in Pyongyang, No. Korea
C: 10 days and nights in Pyongyang, No. Korea
He won’t be at CNN long because he won’t turn on Trump as they had hoped he would after being fired. Good for him. I am proud of him.
sniff...sniff...sniff....Why do I feel Donald is standing behind the curtain in all this. LOL
sounds like CNN just brought him on to try to milk him for dirt... if he continues to not cooperate it’s hard to imagine he will be around CNN for long..... do they have him on a daily or weekly stipend?? Will they cut him loose quickly??
Trump for President.
Ha, ha, just watched the interview. Man-O-Man CNN did not get what they paid for! They thought they bought someone who would bash Trump. He buried Clinton and the CNN Anchor was near tears.