Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie
Breitbart ^ | July 7,2016 | by IAN HANCHETT

Posted on 07/07/2016 10:30:36 AM PDT by Hojczyk

During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBI’s interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.

Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the “five or six” who did interview Clinton.

He was then asked, “did she testify or talk to them under oath?” Comey answered, “No.” But added that “it’s still a crime to lie to us.”

When asked if there was a transcript of the interview, Comey stated that there wasn’t one because the interview wasn’t recorded, but there was an analysis of Clinton’s interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; comey; fbi; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
To: Hojczyk

Outrageous!


21 posted on 07/07/2016 10:39:05 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The FBI didn’t bother to video an interview of a target suspect in a months long investigation? That never happens. That shows right there the fix was in.


22 posted on 07/07/2016 10:39:23 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
How can you use jurisprudence to make a statement of guilt or innocence by which you conclude there will be no judicial determination when the interview was just a coffee klache ??????????


Every comment from the last few days, every moment spent even THINKING about this has been for NOTHING ! . !

23 posted on 07/07/2016 10:40:04 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It was just a Meet and Greet where Hillary supplied the Food and Drinks and charged it to the Government


24 posted on 07/07/2016 10:40:51 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Comey seems to think that the notion of “transparency” should mitigate what is otherwise a confounding decision on his part to not prosecute. Transparency is expected....not a virtue.


25 posted on 07/07/2016 10:40:57 AM PDT by yetidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

>Her interview wasn’t tape recorded? Why not? Does anyone think anyone else would be afforded that privilege? And, if Hillary was afforded a privilege that other people are not, then shouldn’t the interview be done again, with established procudures and different personnel?

The FBI as a rule doesn’t tape record interviews. This makes it much easier for them to make up items to lock up little people and let big fish like Hillary skate.


26 posted on 07/07/2016 10:41:39 AM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Gowdy did blow holes in Comey’s argument of Hillary’s lack of intent. That is on the record.

The level of corruption in government still runs deep.


27 posted on 07/07/2016 10:41:41 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jokemoke

This makes the FBI look like fools…

And no one is going to jump ship

This also makes Hillary look bad to the average person who is not a diehard Democrat


28 posted on 07/07/2016 10:42:55 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

No transcript? How would they prove she lied? If she can violate the law for four years and with evidence that she did up to her ear lobes and get a pass...


29 posted on 07/07/2016 10:43:35 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Mulder ... Scully .... come in to my office ....


30 posted on 07/07/2016 10:44:12 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: knarf
I've been vegetating on X Files since I got NETFLIX a month or so ago ....

Believe me ... it is no longer sci-fi entertainment ...

31 posted on 07/07/2016 10:45:48 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it ticks people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

My impression is that they did the bare minimum to be able to honestly say they complied with the law.

It’s obvious they didn’t pursue details any more than they thought was necessary to protect themselves.

It seems almost as if they made sure they didn’t find irrefutable evidence that would have required them to act against Hillary and her aides/cohorts.


32 posted on 07/07/2016 10:46:38 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Patent BS. A political white wash job.
Hillary Clinton...CORRUPT TO THE CORE!!
33 posted on 07/07/2016 10:46:51 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Even if it’s a crime, “no reasonable prosecutor” would indict the future queen.

It’s not about the facts, it’s about the person. Comey is saying the same thing as BLM. BLM is saying individual law enforcers DO decide unfairly based on the race of the individual while Comey is saying prosecutors SHOULD decide unequally based on class of the individual.

BLM should hate Comey for making the case that it’s acceptable to enforce laws unevenly. And everyone else should hate Comey for making the case that BLM has a valid concern with our legal system.


34 posted on 07/07/2016 10:47:05 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onona

Herself is simply not sophisticated enough to know whether what Herself utters is a lie or the truth.

Maybe it is time to pull her security clearance. Lord knows, clearances have been suspended for much less.

Then, of course, Herself cannot be permitted to attend the White House briefings, should Herself still, against all good sense and logic, become the Democrat candidate for President.

“Out of the loop” is no way to go through life.


35 posted on 07/07/2016 10:47:16 AM PDT by alloysteel (Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The Federal Bureau of Incompetence


36 posted on 07/07/2016 10:47:18 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Face it people the interview never happened. No video or transcript it never happened. What interview on Saturday?


37 posted on 07/07/2016 10:47:23 AM PDT by magua (baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The Emperor is naked.


38 posted on 07/07/2016 10:48:07 AM PDT by Lexington Green (The FBI has murdered its own credibillity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green

I hope you don’t mean Hillary even Bill can’t take it.


39 posted on 07/07/2016 10:49:44 AM PDT by magua (baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
And no one is going to jump ship

Where are the stampeding herds of honorable men and women of the DOJ and FBI who we were assured would bail out if Hillary was not held responsible for her criminal actions?


40 posted on 07/07/2016 10:49:47 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson