To: NoLibZone
Why is not the argument that it doesn’t matter if he had a permit or not, if he reached for a gun after the officer told him to stop, no permit or NRA endorsement or outrage is going to change that he was going to get shot.
To: Molon Labbie
I’ve read that he was a convicted felon and a gang member.How would he have a valid permit?
5 posted on
07/10/2016 3:14:56 PM PDT by
Farmer Dean
(Never be more than two steps away from your weapon.)
To: Molon Labbie
He's been charged 79 times (No felony convictions), however, it's routine to downgrade charges.
The wording is also suspect. I am certain Media groups have been bending over backwards to hide, obfuscate, and mislead.
The Media still peddles lies about Trayvon Martin.
Hands Up, Don't Shoot is a Media Myth nurtured and tended.
To: Molon Labbie
I have the feeling that in a few months we will add:
“He had a permit” to the “Had had his hands up and said dont shoot”, list.
9 posted on
07/10/2016 3:22:45 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(Hillary's nominatin = 60's Violence. "Constant conflict is actually often good politics"-Clinton)
To: Molon Labbie
the girlfriend stated ‘there was some weed’ in the vehicle.
Isn’t having ‘weed’ in the car automatic, on-the-spot, right-now, immediately-if-not-sooner, revocation of CC, making whether he was or was not legally permitted a completely irrelevant point?
63 posted on
07/10/2016 6:51:31 PM PDT by
blueplum
(March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?)
To: Molon Labbie
It matters if he was reaching for his ID, as the cop told him to do, not his gun.
Ed
73 posted on
07/10/2016 11:37:40 PM PDT by
Sir_Ed
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson