I’m not. She stupidly ripped the veil off the “non-partisan” supreme court image and exposed them for what we all knew they were: partisan hacks.
Even these leftards are realizing that #blackbowelmovements are guaranteeing a Trump win
The comparison to Bush/Gore is spot on.
I think as delusional as they are, they realize if Trump wins it will change the court for decades to come. They are basically trying to tell that old coot to shut up. It won’t work, IMO.
the only reason they’re concerned about this is she might be forced to recuse herself when making decisions on cases brought during a Trump administration, and he supports the case in front of the court.
lots of small people HAVE BIG MEGAPHONES
and NO CLASS NO HONOR NO CHARACTER NO BRAINS NO INTEGRITY
and can be bought like a $2 crackhead hooker
Ginsberg should resign. She’s 83 and needs to spend some time with her family anyway. Maybe go on lecture circuit or simply take a nap.
Buzzy craved power more than what she thinks is the good of her country. She could have resigned under Obama. Instead, President Trump will pick her replacement.
She acted stupidly.
Like anybody would have thought differently had she not said it. They are just upset that there is now, no defensible argument to counter to counter that claim it should it come up. That is why they are speaking out about her speaking out.
Really? I’m surprised the comments shed any light whatsoever on the partisan nature of the Supreme Court.
Isn’t some old, tall, historic building perhaps missing a lost gargoyle from its facade?
She was always a partisan hack, this just makes it indisputable for all to see.
I’m glad she spoke out — it tears away the facade that pretends the liberals on the Supreme Court are anything but partisans. WHen they go about ignoring the US Constitution and making up law as they go along, they are serving their political cause(s) and not the Constitution and the body of US laws.
Also validating his assertion that the judiciary is politically biased.
Both WaPo and the NYTimes know that if the Election somehow ends up at the USSC, she will now have to recuse herself.
Her comments have to be in the running for Most Unethical Behavior By A SCOTUS Justice.
I am NOT shocked that both birdcage liner publications took the opportunity to print a very dishonest purported criticism of Ginsburg.
But their columns actually were NOT so much a criticism of the justice as they were merely snide paraphrasings of Ginsburg’s remarks, smearing them into those papers’ own more slanderous, untrue blackguarding words against Trump.
They went very light on Ginsburg, but piled onto Trump. But what would we expect from either of those two rags?
She doesn’t have Scalia there to gently nudge her in the ribs when she’s had a bit of wine.
Has SCOTUS bowdlerized her yet? (or whatever they do when a Justice goes rogue?)
FUNYT. FUWP.
She is the perfect judge to Obama and his ilk, a rubber stamp. In fact, she, Breyer and the wise Latina Sotomayor are the three most predictable SC justices ever. There’s no denying this.