Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyDancer

It was struck down for a blanket restoration. This time he’s restoring rights “individually.”


20 posted on 07/23/2016 10:02:30 AM PDT by PROCON (Americans First or Terrorists First - Choose in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: PROCON

Ah, okay. Well not okay but ya.


21 posted on 07/23/2016 10:03:01 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

It was struck down for a blanket restoration. This time he’s restoring rights “individually.”
_____________________________________________

Whether in masse or individually, it still is an executive order. Need to read the court order to see if he has the authority to rewrite Virginia law.


43 posted on 07/23/2016 10:17:32 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
It was struck down for a blanket restoration. This time he’s restoring rights “individually.”

Not if he's restoring them all. It still becomes a "blanket" restoration, he's just merely going through the appearance of individual consideration. This is a loop hole, and I am suspecting the court will not be amused at his attempt to exploit it contrary to their order.

I wish Republicans had these sort of balls when defying courts. Our side merely rolls over and whines.

57 posted on 07/23/2016 10:30:38 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson