[be-baw]

So Coulter says Huelskamp disavowed Trump, while Erickson says he tithed himself to Trump? Are they saying the opposite of one another, or am I misinterpreting?

[Cboldt]

Coulter and Ericson are in harmony. Erickson blames the voters for rejecting Huelscamp by following Trump, not that Huelscamp was following Trump.

[Road Warrior ‘04]

So Coulter says Huelskamp disavowed Trump, while Erickson says he tithed himself to Trump? Are they saying the opposite of one another, or am I misinterpreting?

The way I see it is if Ann Coulter likes it and Fatboy Erickson dislikes it, it's a good thing!

[trebb]

So Coulter says Huelskamp disavowed Trump, while Erickson says he tithed himself to Trump? Are they saying the opposite of one another, or am I misinterpreting?

Erikson tried to make it that those who back Trump are anti-conservative and those who oppose him (even though that would help Hillary into the WH) are the "true conservatives"...

[ManHunter]

That appears to be the case, but, as I recall, Huelskamp was a member of the #NEVERTRUMP crowd, which isn’t mentioned n the AP article. While I think his defeat is primarily due to opposition and funding from the R side of the uniparty, I’d like to think that his opposition to Trump was a contributing factor.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/nevertrump-ks-lawmaker-loses-primary-pro-trump-upstart/