So, after November and the anticipated Hillary loss....and the continuation of the Clinton Foundation with expected donations to continue....what exactly do these donor-countries expect to get from Bill and Hillary? Will Bill still deliver $400,000 speeches? Will Hillary get $250,000 for a speech?
The normalization of obvious, screaming evil - what the MSM does best.
“Tell me, Eva, what type of tea do you prefer to unwind at the end of a long day touring concentration camps? Is it a hardship that the war is interrupting the supply of chamomile?
The NY Slime trying to come clean before their “Goddess” Hildabeast takes a fall, real or imaginary, in either case it will be real, watch for it.
So... it was all very innocent and after November it will stop. Riiiight!
“America, I will stop pimping you out for cold cash for me, if you just elect me President!”
So, why doesn't he offer to RETURN all teh foreign and Corporate money? It's all DIRTY!
‘the sprawling philanthropy’
Yeah, right. As long as the definition of ‘philanthropy,’ is, ‘lining the pockets of the Clinton family,’ that designation is accurate.
“Let us back in the WH and we’ll swear off the bribes for a while.” Billary
Hey, who woke the New York Slimes up? I mean, the overseas money to the Clintons has been known since the mid-1990’s (just ask Al Gore about his rich female Buddhist nuns and how much they gave to him).
Oh, by the way, the Mafia, through one of their controlled unions, LIUNA, gave the Clintons and the Democrat Senate Campaign Committee about $10,000,000 in the mid 90’s.
Hey, when you’re on a roll, why stop?
Maybe in 50 years if they last that long, the NYT will have caught up on the dirty dealings of the Democrats from Ted Kennedy to Al Gore to John F**king Kerry, to Hillary, Bill, Sandy Burglar (Berge), John Podesta, George Soros the Puppetmaster/Moneymeister, the Cuomos, and Terry McAuliffe, just to mention a few.
Oh, gotta throw in Pelosi and husband, along with Diane Feinstein and husband. All should have been in jail long ago. In fact, I think Feinstein’s husband was.
Tomorrow’s NYT’s headline: “Trump Harshly Criticizes Pres. Obama for taking a Vacation”. More at 6.
The comment section for this article is rather interesting. It looks as if comments critical of the article and in support of the Clintons have very few “up” votes. Comments critical of the Clintons have in some cases 20 times the number of “up” votes as the others.
When do we get to see a list of the charities that the “Foundation” has given money to ..??
While I suspect the list is in reality very small; the Clintons lie so much, I bet they’ll come up with something spectacular .. and then we’ll see if the supposed benefactor will have the courage to expose her lie.
Wow! I’ve become quite cynical about the Clintons.
Yeah,, like the Clinton Foundation is right up there with Saint Judes in the wonderful work that they do. /S
The Clinton’s BOTH belong in jail for what they’ve done and anyone with an HONEST heart knows that’s TRUE.
Even though this article doesn’t go far enough re: the crime and corruption of Hitlery and Bill and Chelsea Clinton, at least it covers some of it. It is so horrible even the NY Slimes couldn’t ignore it totally. Am sure, now that this article is done, they won’t revisit the subject at all during the rest of the campaign. So, as someone else has said, print this article out, make copies, and hand it out whenever the opportunity arises.
Foundation Ties.
She founded it, devised it, ran it, she named it after herself.
Do the people who support her have this deranged view of life? Do they ignore wrongdoing in their kids. Their spouses? Is there a syndrome that half the people in this country ail from?
Must have been buried on page 29. This is just the Times’s attempt to be able to say this is all “old news” come election time.
Here’s paragraph twelve or so which states that everyone does it. In this case, Trump. Note how it the center, where anyone reading this piece, over coffee, taking it seriously, will by now be skimming the details. This paragraph talks about, after a few sentences, Hillarys ties to real estate moguls. It is designed for the pro Hillary reader to skip over the part that says Hillary took dough from a real estate guy and assume the subject of the paragraph was still trump which it is not. It was switched back to Hillary. A rare thing in supposed good writing switching subjects halfway through. And they happened to be talking about corruption in real estate, Trump’s milieu.
This is a step up from propaganda toward something more blatantly deceptive. As is the whole article.
“Still, Mr. Trump has seized on emails released over the past several weeks from Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, in which a handful of donors are mentioned. He has attacked her over an email chain that showed Douglas J. Band, an adviser to Mr. Clinton, seeking to arrange a meeting between a senior American government official and Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese-Nigerian real estate developer who donated between $1 million and $5 million. Mr. Chagoury explained through a spokesman that he had simply wanted to provide insights on elections in Lebanon.”
Here it is. What does Trump have to do with any of this? Well the times tries and its readers will walk away saying trump does it too
Mrs. Clinton’s opponent, Donald J. Trump, could face his own complications if he becomes president, with investments abroad and hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate debt — financial positions that could be affected by moves he makes in the White House. And on Friday, Paul Manafort resigned as chairman of the Trump campaign, in part because of reports about his lucrative consulting work on behalf of pro-Russian Ukrainian politicians.
Still, Mr. Trump has seized on emails released over the past several weeks from Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, in which a handful of donors are mentioned. He has attacked her over an email chain that showed Douglas J. Band, an adviser to Mr. Clinton, seeking to arrange a meeting between a senior American government official and Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese-Nigerian real estate developer who donated between $1 million and $5 million. Mr. Chagoury explained through a spokesman that he had simply wanted to provide insights on elections in Lebanon.
“Vanessa Friedman of The New York Times wrote, “Ms. Trump’s choice of a white dress…sent all sorts of interesting subliminal signals.” Just a week later, Wellington gushed over Hillary Clinton’s all-white DNC outfit. “White is a hue that’s both soft and strong.”
It’s impossible to take anything the New York Times vomits out seriously... They should change their name to “We Whore For Democrats”
global charity????? open the books and lets see where all the “charitable donations” have gone, better yet lets get some insiders who can tell us where the money was sent for other reasons