Interesting dichotomy in polls. The online tracking polls all show a close race with a recent Trump lead. The media polls show in many instances large Clinton leads. This is beginning to be shown as fraudulent due to close and/or Trump leads in FL, OH, the recent PA poll, Iowa, etc. look for the national media polls to still show a sizable Clinton lead to maintain the narrative but with a gradual tightening of the race.
I thought scientific polls would have similar results...unless there is another agenda???
Well within the Margin of Lawyer as Mark Steyn would say.
Is UPI still owned by the Moonies?...............
Realclearpolitics has gone to the Hillary/Dark Side. Still has Hillary ahead by 4-10 points. Useless.
Besides the natural flaws in the National Polls and the usual over sampling of Dems., let’s remember that a wide margin in favor of Hillary in States like CA, NY and MA Etc. can skew the National numbers. If trump will concentrate of the Battleground States of FL, OH and PA etc. he can win this thing. Remember, George Bush lost to Al Gore in the National vote, but won the electoral vote.
Yet, right now on FoxNews they are talking up the Quinipiac poll as evidence Hillary will have a massive landslide. What a bunch of asshats.
I figure that the Republicans need at least a 10 point lead to overcome voter fraud.
Huh? UPI and LAT are MSM.
They run reputable polls and they’re not selling an agenda.
That said, no recent national poll has shown Hillary with that big lead.
Clinging on to this poll because I want to believe it shows what others are missing...it’s crunch time and I’m SEMI worried knowing other polls have not been encouraging.
“2nd consecutive day of a Trump lead. I would be curious to see the results if they polled a 4 way race, which they don’t.”
That would be reality. To exclude Stein and Johnson is not reality.
How does this poll get any sort of R/D/I balance if the respondents “self select”?
Results not with standing, does this poll have any credibility? No one seems to cite it.