Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Orders Review of Troubled New Carrier
gCaptain ^ | August 29, 2016 | Anthony Capaccio

Posted on 08/30/2016 6:11:03 AM PDT by artichokegrower

The Pentagon’s top weapons buyer has ordered an independent review of the $12.9 billion Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, citing a list of actual and potential deficiencies with the costliest warship ever.

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
“recent issues discovered with the Main Turbine Generators,” launch and recover systems for aircraft and a new dual-band radar that he said has had “integration issues”


Other than it can't move, launch or recover aircraft and the radar doesn't work it's a pretty good ship.

1 posted on 08/30/2016 6:11:03 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

SABOTAGE by Iranian, Russian, North Korean and Chinese agents, for years...


2 posted on 08/30/2016 6:13:42 AM PDT by Netz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Not to mention always bumping into things...

I mean, could you think of a less auspicious name?

Okay okay, maybe Harvey Milk.

3 posted on 08/30/2016 6:15:48 AM PDT by To Hell With Poverty (No one in the field is voting for Frail, Pale and Belongs in Jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Col. Robert Laurel Smith: In summation, what you have before you is...

Sgt. Fanning: A troop transport that can’t carry troops, a reconnaissance vehicle that’s too conspicuous to do reconnaissance...

Lt. Colonel James Burton: And a quasi-tank that has less armor than a snow-blower, but carries enough ammo to take out half of D.C. THIS is what we’re building?


4 posted on 08/30/2016 6:16:40 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#NeverTrumpers: "commercial self-interest masquerading as ideological purity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Probably used Chinese steel and parts.


5 posted on 08/30/2016 6:17:07 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netz

Probably by US defense contractors, following the old consultant mantra: “If you aren’t part of the solution, there is good money to be made in prolonging the problem.”


6 posted on 08/30/2016 6:18:39 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

The Navy has had a DBR program underway for at least a couple of decades now that I know of. Combining lower frequency wide area search/scanning with high speed X band search and track/engagement is one thing. Making them both LO is another.


7 posted on 08/30/2016 6:28:32 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netz

Don’t need sabotage when gross incompetence is coupled with no oversight on a fat government contract.


8 posted on 08/30/2016 6:35:57 AM PDT by Flick Lives (TRIGGER WARNING - Posts may require application of sarcasm filter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

But is the crew diverse and inclusive of the LGBTQ community? That’s what matters to the Navy nowadays. A global force for goody goody.


9 posted on 08/30/2016 6:42:30 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Look, as long as it has transgendered everything, and the crew has taken sensitivity training, these are small issues.


10 posted on 08/30/2016 6:45:17 AM PDT by Fido969 (Maybe I';ve been posting for the last 10 years, and rather than spew cr@p you could look up my posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

With a name like Gerald R. Ford what could go wrong?


11 posted on 08/30/2016 6:53:13 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Though it was WAY before my time, I've read about a time where arming the military WAS NOT considered a jobs program. And how a certain senator from MO, Harry S. Truman, seriously looked at what these military contractors were doing, kicking asses and taking names.

It seems that for many of today's defense contractors, it's all about making as much as possible, while the brass at the pentagon are working to pad their own nests, setting up a nice comfy consultant just once their hitch is up. And finally, congress sees the military as nothing more than a social experiment crucible and jobs program for their state.

Eisenhower was right in a lot of ways.

Mark

12 posted on 08/30/2016 6:54:22 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Could send out one of the Littoral Combat Ships for an escort. Oh wait never mind

Littoral Combat Ship USS Freedom Suffers Engine Casualty

http://gcaptain.com/littoral-combat-ship-uss-freedom-suffers-engineering-casualty/


13 posted on 08/30/2016 7:14:26 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Uh, Jim Burton was a Colonel when he got involved in the Bradley Fighting Vehicle test program. He was my boss.

TC


14 posted on 08/30/2016 7:31:14 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

It’s only tax dollars! It’s not like it’s real money

The phrase “Good enough for government work” means any old crap you can throw together you can give to the customer on a government contract

When idiot Al Gore was running for office, he said “Good enough for government work” was a sign of quality- I would LOVE to meet the guy who told him that and shake his hand.

I bet he was laughing his ass off (as well as thousands of other workers who heard it) when alGore repeated it in public.


15 posted on 08/30/2016 7:32:58 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

So they can find a FED that can ride my ass to do a sand cone test for every 6 nuke gauge tests on a parking lot and “while the spec is 95% we’d like to see you get 97% for compaction” but they can’t seem to round up a pack of these anal QC guys to ride herd on a 12 billion dollar carrier???


16 posted on 08/30/2016 7:35:05 AM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck

Yes, I know Burton was an Air Force colonel. I put the quote from the movie up because of the parallel theme (an aircraft carrier that can’t arrest landings ...) Besides, it is a great quote!

So, he was your boss ... tell us a little about him that we didn’t get in the movie or the book.


17 posted on 08/30/2016 7:47:00 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#NeverTrumpers: "commercial self-interest masquerading as ideological purity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Your cynicism is really uncalled for. First of all, the carrier bears the name of a president, following recent tradition where the presidency is worshipped.
The old tiresome Revolutionary war era names are no longer used.
There will be no bothersome Ticonderoga, no Cowpens, no Saratoga, no Lexington, no Bennington. No Yorktown, no Enterprise.
Now we get to worship politicians.

And you selfish prig, did you even take a moment to see how the ship was engineered and designed to finally accommodate women and their needs in living quarters? And what about trannys?
The navy has made this one of the happiest ships to be found anywhere outside the dedicated commercial cruise ship fleet.

Sometimes....


18 posted on 08/30/2016 7:48:46 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck; NonValueAdded

I read that they reduced him a rank in the movie because the actor looked to young to be a full colonel.


19 posted on 08/30/2016 8:19:53 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

Honoring the memory of the president who declared that Eastern Europe wasn’t under soviet domination.


20 posted on 08/30/2016 9:30:40 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson