Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Woman Blasts Drone 'to Smithereens' with Shotgun
Popular Mechanics ^ | 8/30/16 | Eric Limer

Posted on 09/01/2016 9:57:26 AM PDT by Impala64ssa

"It came over my airspace, 25 or 30 feet above my trees, and hovered for a second. I blasted it to smithereens."​

A woman in Virginia shot down a drone flying near her property in June of this year. It's at least the third time this has happened in the U.S., with previous incidents in Kentucky and Tennessee.

Originally reported in the local Fauquier Times and subsequently covered by Ars Technica, the shooter was Jennifer Youngman, a neighbor to actor and director Robert Duvall. She had been cleaning her shotguns on the porch when two men stopped on a nearby road and started flying a drone around the general vicinity. Youngman left the drone alone while it flew around nearby fields, but prepared to take it down and ultimately did when it flew over her land.

As she told Ars Technica:

I loaded my shotgun and took the safety off, and this thing came flying over my trees. I don't know if they lost command or if they didn't have good command, but the wind had picked up. It came over my airspace, 25 or 30 feet above my trees, and hovered for a second. I blasted it to smithereens.

Shooting down drones is a bit of a legal gray area in the United States at the moment. Opponents point out that, according to FAA classifications, drones are technical aircraft and interfering with the flight of one is a federal crime. So far no shooters have been prosecuted on the federal level. In fact other drone shooters, like William Merideth, have ultimately been cleared of all charges, though the owner of that drone is still pursuing a civil suit for $1,500 in damages.

To her credit, Youngman told Ars Technica that she went about shooting down the drone with 7.5 birdshot, which is both the most effective way to take a drone out of the sky, but also ensures that the projectiles won't do any harm on the way down. The drone, however, still can. Youngman said the crash left "two punctures in [her] lawn tractor."

The best way to avoid that might be to not shoot down the thing down in the first place.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: airrights; banglist; bigbrother; drones; privacy; uav; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: DoughtyOne

The FAA claims from the surface up. The drone is registered with the FAA. What is this airspace you claim to be yours?


21 posted on 09/01/2016 10:12:46 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Ahhhhh but of course....the Celts are the originators of all things


22 posted on 09/01/2016 10:14:49 AM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
Pull!
23 posted on 09/01/2016 10:15:09 AM PDT by kiryandil (Hillary Clinton is not sophisticated enough to understand the Bill of Rights, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

How about a law to keep them at least out of shotgun range. Even that would be pretty invasive, given the photographic/video resolution and distance audio-gathering apparatus tht we now have. I would prefer no drones at all. R/C mdels in select areas excepted.


24 posted on 09/01/2016 10:15:22 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Now these guys can make enough cash to buy a bunch of them.

On what theory? First, it would probably be deemed a trespass by them justifying her right to shoot it down. Second, even if she were found liable in a civil suit, the damages would be limited to the value of the destroyed drone - a couple of hundred bucks at most.

25 posted on 09/01/2016 10:15:28 AM PDT by KevinB (Barack Obama: Our first black, gay, Kenyan, Socialist, Muslim president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

“The best way to avoid that might be to not shoot down the thing down in the first place.”

Thank you, Popular Mechanics.

Our caged birds thank you too.


26 posted on 09/01/2016 10:15:29 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I’m not a slave to the government.

I’m not a big fan of ANY government entity except for our military.

My space is my space, and the FAA can go —— itself.


27 posted on 09/01/2016 10:16:07 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

She used #7.5 shot. I think I would go for #6 shot. My dad’s old Remington 1100 with the 30” full choke barrel would probably be good medicine for a drone.


28 posted on 09/01/2016 10:16:09 AM PDT by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Some privacy-loving patriot will probably do it! Great idea!! :)

Hey, if my local movie theater can have a Laser Tag room, or whatever they call it, I can only imagine how successful a Drone Skeet Shooting Range would be! I’d definitely try it!


29 posted on 09/01/2016 10:17:06 AM PDT by TXBlair (We will not forget Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I was at the local Food Lion grocery a few days ago, and people were standing in front of the store, staring up at the sky. I looked and didn’t see anything at first. Then, the sheriff’s deputies pulled in and went to the grassy area at the front of the parking lot. Guy standing in the grass with a controller of some sort, so it registered, drone. Scanned the sky again, saw it, quad rotor, pretty good size. They made him bring it down and leave. I don’t know what the law is regarding these things in NC, or whether the owners of the property just didn’t want him doing it there.


30 posted on 09/01/2016 10:18:08 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yes, someone is watching her. Regardless of intent someone is just out of reach and they are watching her.

Build a Jacob’s Ladder. When the drone comes over in a manageable place, turn it on.

RF devices HATE Jacobs ladders. Go scoop it up and enjoy your new toy.


31 posted on 09/01/2016 10:18:10 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
Opponents point out that, according to FAA classifications, drones are technical[ly] aircraft and interfering with the flight of one is a federal crime.

Transmitting classified government information on unsecured private computers is a federal crime.

It's much more serious, but it doesn't get prosecuted.

So, I guess they can just jam their "federal crime" where the sun don't shine.

32 posted on 09/01/2016 10:18:51 AM PDT by kiryandil (Hillary Clinton is not sophisticated enough to understand the Bill of Rights, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
One would assume that emergency medical and police drones would be prominently marked.

The prospective Amazon Delivery Drone certainly is. . .


33 posted on 09/01/2016 10:20:56 AM PDT by Salgak (You're in Strange Hands with Tom Stranger. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

34 posted on 09/01/2016 10:21:12 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
No, you do not own airspace above your property.

Here is an interesting article on the subject.

35 posted on 09/01/2016 10:21:15 AM PDT by KevinB (Barack Obama: Our first black, gay, Kenyan, Socialist, Muslim president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

“two punctures in [her] lawn tractor.”

TIRES. Two punctures in [her] lawn tractor TIRES.

Sheesh...


36 posted on 09/01/2016 10:21:22 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Normal” aircraft could do that with telescopes, keep in mind.


True, but it is more difficult and they have to want the images a lot worse. :-)

Drones have done for this sort of surveillance what Smart Phone cameras have done for photography. You “always” have a good camera with you so it’s much easier to take awesome pictures.


37 posted on 09/01/2016 10:23:35 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

But most aircraft short of low-income hovering helicopters aren’t being used for direct high-resolution observation.
Drones, in current colloquial terms, are primarily for that purpose.


38 posted on 09/01/2016 10:25:53 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Here in California, we have problems with many folks who fly their drones into Wildfires just to snoop. This gets in the way of rescue teams and water being delivered. If more drone owners don’t start using consideration of privacy or common sense respect for others, it is a sure invitation for more Government intervention. It will start with licensing fees.


39 posted on 09/01/2016 10:26:00 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

“On what theory? “

The fact that she clearly said she wasn’t sure why it ended up where it did, didn’t bother to figure it out, and then proceeded to destroy their drone after it hovered for a grand total of a second. Her whole story seemed to read like she was just waiting for any reason to fire her shotgun at it. She comes across as a nut.

Calling it “trespassing” is like calling a kid whose football accidentally went over the fence, and some yahoo next door shooting the football the moment they saw it, trespassing.

Give these guys a minute to correct for anything that might have gone wrong before you just willfully destroy stuff that doesn’t belong to you.


40 posted on 09/01/2016 10:27:32 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson