Horseshit.
Their “expenses” are reimbursed.
The Clintons and other liberals, seem to enjoy insulting our intelligence.
no, they get their millions from speaking fees, from people they tell to donate to their foundation.
If you’re defending, your losing
It’s starting to crumble
LOL. Democrat “pundits” are a bunch of morons.
ROFLMAO
They get lavish first class travel accommodations when it is not offered by their patsies. Bill was getting paid for speeches that pas around $500,000 per speech, so that is not considered Foundation income. But when they are involved with putting foreign businessmen in from of US officials, you have to wonder how much they are paid for this work. And do they get stock, etc., in foreign companies when they put these people in from of the US officials that will pull strings for them. Hillary had to make a decision on whether to fine, or sanction Ericsson of Sweden. After Ericsson paid Bill Clinton $675,000 for a speech, there were no sanctions at all placed on Ericsson. Pay for Play.
Hilary Rosen...an unimpeachable source (nyuck! nyuck! nyuck!)
Americans seem to have forgotten that Hillary was fired from her job as Secretary of State.
Obama, who is not a good manager, even knew enough to fire her.
And this “canned” Secretary of State now wants to be our President?
Very little of the money even gets to the “charities” that hey fund, and even less gets to the alleged beneficiaries.
They’re selling influence and access.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
These people have no shame.
The Clinton Foundation takes “donations” in exchange for political favors.
For every dollar donated to the Clinton Foundation, 90 cents goes to admin expense (i.e. lining the pockets of Friends of the Clintons), the other 10 cents goes to actual work, like building factories for Friends of the Clintons in areas of their choosing. But none of it goes to the Clintons themselves, nosiree.
Still are deducting their dirty undies though. 100% media horse shit! ...
Sure, no “salary”, but do they receive a “stipend”? An honorarium? There are a hundred ways to re-label income from an organization like that. As for “no personal benefit”, to paraphrase William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, that depends on what the meaning of the words “personal benefit” is.
“...and storm recovery in Haiti. “
Let’s have a serious investigation into the CF “work” in Haiti.
“Addressing AIDS in Africa”
(Now there’s a Lib-Tard catch phrase!)
What exactly does that mean?