Posted on 09/13/2016 1:22:54 PM PDT by servo1969
Brian Pagliano was hired by the State Department as a full time employee to oversee Hillary Clinton's personal property server as a GS-15-C which is a highly paid position for people with as a subject matter expert with exceptional technical skills and advanced degrees, typically a PhD
Brian Pagliano was a political hack with no advanced computer skills of qualifications
Her server became classified the second classified info was on it. Classified information DOES NOT have to have banners stating it’s classification. Anyone that has a clearance and knows anything classified can type up an email and send it knowing the information is classified or receive an email and know the actual information is classified. When that happens, any server and or computer the email is sent from and received becomes classified. Retrieving and destroying is damn near impossible...
If email is sent from or pulled from a classified network, then the email is classified with the proper heading i.e. (C) CONFIDENTIAL (S) SECRET etc. Classified documents have every paragraph preceded with the classification of that paragraph including (U) for UNCLASS. The (C) Clinton thought was a paragraph scheme like a, b, c is just more proof she’s an idiot.
The main question on that particular email is that it came from a classified computer and someone knowingly copied, scanned or sent it ti an unclassified system to send to Clinton. That’s a criminal charge.
The IT folks working her server probably wouldn’t know what’s classified or not but common sense would tell you working for the Secretary of State just about everything is “Sensitive” at the very least.
He can still invoke the 5th when testifying in front of Congress. He just had immunity from any type of criminal prosecution in the e-mail case. The DOJ deal and this deal are two completely different things. For instance, if there had ended up being a trial of some sort in the e-mail case that was being prosecuted by the DOJ, and he invoked 5th while testifying in that trial, then they would revoke any immunity and hammer him with any statements he may have made to them. He doesn’t have to tell Congress anything.
So, you're correct: HRC never had an account on any secure USG system.
Never. Because it was her personal server -- and because HRC is too important for the Nation's security to concern her psychopathic ego.
Thanks for the confirmation.
It is shocking that someone could copy or transmit information from a secure system to a non-secure system and not be flagged or caught in the act by the system itself and reported to an administrator, unless the administrator was also aware and ignored what was detected because it came from the top. The problem here is everyone in the State Department is covering their own a$$es as well as Hillary’s a$$ and there are no live whistle blowers or nobody for the whistle blowers to go to because Obama is corrupt, the FBI is compromised and corrupt, and only karma, fate, and ultimately God can help us now.
Had any member of the military shared anything classified with this guy they’d lose their clearance and face serious consequences. Allowing this person access should be grounds to reopen the case against Clinton, and; these facts should fry her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.