Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/23/2016 8:36:20 AM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: 11th_VA

Okay, but is she going to testify?


2 posted on 09/23/2016 8:37:04 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Normally, I would say, Hooray, they are getting to the bottom of things. In this case, I suspect it’s just a preemptive pardon, no more.


3 posted on 09/23/2016 8:37:47 AM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

I’m guessing immunity from the DoJ AG Lynch I presume.


4 posted on 09/23/2016 8:38:15 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

She’s one of the lead figures in the Clinton Crime Family... why on Earth would she get immunity? There’s no way she’d turn state’s evidence on Her.


5 posted on 09/23/2016 8:38:31 AM PDT by thoughtomator (This message has been encrypted in ROT13 twice for maximum security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Normally, giving someone immunity from prosecution is to encourage or require them to testify against a bigger fish.

In the Banana Republic of Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch and James Comey, giving someone immunity is to protect them from prosecution by President Trump and Attorney General Giuliani or Christie.


7 posted on 09/23/2016 8:39:07 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

immunity for what ? who is her client ? does immunity override privlege ?


8 posted on 09/23/2016 8:39:20 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Eventually, Hillary will be given immunity so they can prosecute some low level network technician.


9 posted on 09/23/2016 8:39:31 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

NO Clinton inner circle supporter will EVER implicate the Clintons.
Mills will never say anything.


10 posted on 09/23/2016 8:39:32 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

By Whom?

Congress? FBI?

It is insane.


13 posted on 09/23/2016 8:40:58 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

As I thought with Hillary’s server host guy (name escapes me), immunity for Mills will be immunity to NOT testify in any way that harms Hillary.


14 posted on 09/23/2016 8:41:02 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Can we all agree that once immunity s granted, she cannot then use 5th Amendment protection, too? Otherwise, who the heck cares if the crooked DoJ or inept FBI grants immunity? Also, DOES THIS MEAN A GRAND JURY WAS IN FACT EMPANELED IN THE EMAIL SCANDAL?


15 posted on 09/23/2016 8:41:20 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

16 posted on 09/23/2016 8:41:30 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

This is a game. She wouldn’t flip if you put dynamite under her trampoline.


17 posted on 09/23/2016 8:41:31 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

As someone has posted before, sometimes immunity is actually used to suppress the truth.


19 posted on 09/23/2016 8:42:33 AM PDT by Paradox ("Wishing for a tautology to enact itself is not a strategy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

If true she will still lose her license to practice law


20 posted on 09/23/2016 8:42:41 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (when the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you Leary is this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

The DOJ might as well give immunity to all liberal government officials and be done with it. They’re not going to charge anyone with anything anyway.


21 posted on 09/23/2016 8:42:44 AM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

She will never tell the truth. Never.


24 posted on 09/23/2016 8:44:04 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

These immunity deals smell like pardons.

Trump will be able to make hay with this.


25 posted on 09/23/2016 8:44:19 AM PDT by joshua c (Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA
In anticipation of the coming Assange dump?

Maybe he is right about what it will reveal.

26 posted on 09/23/2016 8:44:33 AM PDT by Religion and Politics (Time for Trump and supporters to show their strength and resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 11th_VA

Ft. Marcy Park?


29 posted on 09/23/2016 8:45:18 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Why isn't Hillary in jail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson