Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Keith Lamont Scott Had Followed Gun Laws, Would He Still Be Alive?
The Federalist ^ | 9-23-16 | D.C. McAllister

Posted on 09/23/2016 9:23:44 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2016 9:23:44 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Other articles are unclear as to whether there is a felony conviction in his long criminal record, but if the Federalist is correct, he was shot while committing a felony.


2 posted on 09/23/2016 9:25:15 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Felons doing felonious things often don’t come to a happy end....


3 posted on 09/23/2016 9:32:56 AM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Arrest the judges who let this thug out!


4 posted on 09/23/2016 9:33:31 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"According to records from Bexar County, Texas, Keith Lamont Scott was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in July 2005 and sentenced to seven years in prison."

Time served in prison means he was convicted of a felony. In this case, it was a violent felony.

5 posted on 09/23/2016 9:36:32 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
gun recovered
6 posted on 09/23/2016 9:38:10 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Hey, don’t interrupt the media and Black narrative with facts! Facts don’t have any place in the narrative when Blacks, Dems and the media want to use an incident for their own benefit.


7 posted on 09/23/2016 9:43:57 AM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Carrying a weapon is not a crime; the second amendment to out Constitution says so. Using one in a criminal manner is another story. That is what the prosecution or lack thereof should be based upon.


8 posted on 09/23/2016 9:57:24 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This guy was caught with a gun some 4-5 times in 2002-3. In the 90’s he had a weapon more them once plus a number of charges like weapon with intent (bodily harm /kill etc.). This he is just a great peaceful pillar of the community and/or he was reading a book is Fantasy Island. The deceased was a hard core career thug.


9 posted on 09/23/2016 10:07:47 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

A convicted felon cannot have a gun.


10 posted on 09/23/2016 10:09:08 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Now, now, you all know those were trumped up charges by racist white cops. Poor guy was just trying to turn his life around.


11 posted on 09/23/2016 10:15:52 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20
A convicted felon cannot have a gun.

Where in the second amendment is that specified?

12 posted on 09/23/2016 10:18:54 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

OOPS, missed the ITAL OFF.


13 posted on 09/23/2016 10:20:04 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

The Second Amendment is silent to that. Title 18 USC is much different.

file:///C:/Users/jcpot/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/974Q2ENM/Primer_Firearms.pdf


14 posted on 09/23/2016 10:37:44 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I’d throw his own book at him!


15 posted on 09/23/2016 10:40:21 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If they had been tougher on him for his offenses, he might still be alive (in a cell.)


16 posted on 09/23/2016 10:57:59 AM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Whether he had a gun, could or could not legally have a gun makes no difference.
This incident and every one of the others in recent memory have one thing in common.

Refusal to obey the officer. Some of the shootings could be classified as questionable but even those started as the offender disobeying the cop.

Is there a suicide/martyr tone in the black community ?
Why in the world would a man, ordered out of his car get out with a gun or anything in his hand?

The officer tells you to get out of the car, put your hands on the roof, don’t move. Simple.
Even the incident in Tulsa. The perp walks back to his car hands in the air. But the last few seconds he lowers his hands to the car window. WRONG!
The question is, was the window up or down?
Either way he got an officer antsy.


17 posted on 09/23/2016 12:20:11 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
convicted felon cannot have a gun. Where in the second amendment is that specified?

An interesting discussion, but it is the law and the courts have upheld it as a reasonable restriction. Personally, I'm OK with violent felons, non violent felons who are no threat to self or others, not sure there's a compelling reason to restrict their ownership

18 posted on 09/23/2016 2:05:29 PM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TBP
If they had been tougher on him for his offenses, he might still be alive (in a cell.)

Yes. Or if out might have thought twice before committing a felony by being in possession of a firearm.

19 posted on 09/23/2016 2:07:30 PM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Whether he had a gun, could or could not legally have a gun makes no difference.

Correct. A concealed carry permit doesn't grant you permission to disobey an officer's orders. Including an order to "drop" your weapon.

Why in the world would a man, ordered out of his car get out with a gun or anything in his hand?

Indecision about using it to avoid arrest? I heard the tape released by his family today, and on it his wife(?) screams at the police, but also screams at him, "Keith don't do it!" Several times. Don't do what?

Even the incident in Tulsa. The perp walks back to his car hands in the air. But the last few seconds he lowers his hands to the car window.

I'd speculate in the Tulsa incident the individual was high and hadn't a clue what the officers were saying to him.

20 posted on 09/23/2016 2:12:38 PM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson