Posted on 09/28/2016 6:38:21 PM PDT by Elderberry
The U.S. Department of Justice won’t release the names of attorneys whose conduct in a high-profile immigration case was called “unseemly and unprofessional” by a federal judge, or whether those attorneys will face internal disciplinary action.
The DOJ says it “emphatically” disagrees with Judge Andrew Hanen’s May order in State of Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al., in which he wrote that he was “disappointed” that the court even had to address the subject of lawyer behavior when it has “many more pressing matters on its docket.”
Hanen concluded that DOJ attorneys “effectively misled” the plaintiff states into foregoing a request for a temporary restraining order or an earlier hearing on a motion for an injunction. Their names, following a court order, were redacted from the department’s response to the judge’s order.
Their misrepresentations, the judge said, also “misdirected” the court as to the timeline involved in the implementation of a 2014 Department of Homeland Security directive, which included amendments to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
DOJ attorneys said Obama’s three-year amnesty plan wasn’t being implemented, but the judge says it actually was – and more than 100,000 aliens were to be affected.
The Justice Department declined to release a complete list of all those attorneys involved, and their salaries, to Legal Newsline. Freeny is listed as “Attorney-in-Charge” on one of the DOJ’s earliest filings – a response to the motion for a preliminary injunction.
The lawsuit, filed by 26 states, took issue with the constitutionality of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, or DAPA, program.
The program, announced by President Barack Obama in November 2014 as part of his plan for immigration reform, attempts to grant deferred action to illegal immigrants who are the parents of a U.S. citizen or a lawful
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
And all this time I thought it was a medieval prcatice!
...gibbeting refers to the use of a gallows-type structure from which the dead or dying bodies of executed criminals were hanged on public display to deter other existing or potential criminals. In earlier times up to the late 18th century, live gibbeting also took place in which the condemned was placed alive in a metal cage and left to die of thirst. The term gibbet may also be used to refer to the practice of placing a criminal on display within a gibbet
Get an order from Judge Hanen to release the names under penalty of contempt of court and Rule 11 sanctions and the DOJ will be dancing to a different tune.
Their names and identities will be UNSCRUBBED come January 2017 when Trump assumes office. Many of the participants in the ongoing criminal enterprise of the last 8 years within our government will be exposed.
AND THE KNOW IT!
Just how many politicians/crooks will be packing up their riches and leaving the country prior to Jan. 20th ??
would like to know the names of the assistant USA’s who signed the immunity deals for the email 5.
The SON is becoming the enemy of the people.
My computer would not view the Forbes site. I have java scripts largely disabled. They are covered with such crap.
Found this interesting:
Recommended by Forbes
Many DOJ lawyers are listed as participating in the case. They are James Gilligan, Daniel Hu, Adam Kirschner, Jennifer Ricketts, Daniel Schwei, John Tyler, Kathleen Hartnett, Bradley Cohen and Kyle Freeny.
Future Lamp Post Ornaments.
I have lived in nations that were corrupt. I have lived in nations that were police states. I have lived in nations were the corrupt and the police states were one and the same. I haved lived in nations where the courts were corrupt. I have lived in nations where a corrupt court system became an extension of the Judiciary in conjunction with an impotent legislature.
Today I see the same thing happening in my beloved nation. It never ends well. It always ends at the end of gun barrel. Sometimes the good guys win, most of the times the good guys lose.
Democracy is fragile, it can only exist in a moral nation as immorality always destroys it. Alexander de Tocqueville warned us 200 years ago. I fear he was correct.
The real hell of it is when socialistic Marxist states become supreme they always turn on each other and much death follows. They are always lead by the despots and corrupt. Each Marxist despot thinks his way is better.
Democracy has only existed in Christian Nations or nations that have the same moral structures such as Hinduism and Buddhism and perhaps Shinto. All others fail.
It should be noted that Shinto was the religion of Japan which created great havoc on the world in WWII and Buddhism was the religion of China which had the greatest episode of internal genocide (estimated 90 million) in history. Also, Germany was a Christian Nation that was the nexus of WWII.
Great death was the result of these peoples of Buddhism, Christianity, and Shinto not following their faith but their insane socialist marxists leaders.
The atrocities in the Muslim World are quite in accordance with their faith. It is not redeemable.
Per Bob Dylan, “There is a hard rain gonna fall.”
Very hard rain.
Trump supporter attacked and beaten in El Cajon
(This country is on the verge of a great social explosion)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGRFEiLBZCE
Of course our ,”justice dept.”, has become politicized and worthless.
The entire of obammy’s federal gub mint has been politicized and turned in to horse crap by the magic negro.
>> foregoing a request for a temporary restraining order or an earlier hearing on a motion for an injunction
This is why I hate the “justice” system.
They hide behind crapweasel words and procedures. They won’t conduct business in plain English. They won’t operate in a straightforward manner.
Everything has to be convoluted and hidden behind words and maneuvering.
Back before we became officially a Banana Republic, the term,”Misled the Judge” would have been, “Lied to the Judge”.
Where are real investigative reporters? If they couldn’t get in, they could have sat outside the courtroom and seen what lawyers were involved in this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.