Posted on 09/29/2016 4:27:21 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Let's help Trump win this thing!
What should Trump Pound Hillary on in Debate 2?
And I mean POUND!
When she starts the class warfare hypocrisy re taxes mention how much tax revenue the properties generate from renters\owners and employees and how many people you put to work. She opens her diseased yap about stiffing contractors set her straight. If Madame Bobblehead mentions Trunp U bring up the sham Clinton school etc
He needs his surrogates to make that point. He himself needs to go for the iron fist and velvet glove approach to hammering home his economic programs over her socialist approach.
Then address her every time as crooked Hillary....
And she probably shat her pants again.
Here are my suggestions. We love you and your entire family, and thank you for sticking your neck out by taking on this task. I knew you would make it this far. Now just don't choke like Romney did! Let that be your motivation to prepare for this next debate.
For example: (look directly in camera) "How can Americans trust this person (point her way) who was either selling USA secrets to our enemies, or is too stupid to operate a computer & cell phone? And with her history of taking millions from foreign countries for State Dept favors, how do we know she won't be blackmailed, or worse?" Look right in the camera and speak to every American who's listening. Furrow your brow and speak to the soccer Moms who love their children and want to keep them safe.
The problem the Clintons have always presented is that they put so many perfectly legitimate targets on your radar that they are then able to make it hard to attack them all without sounding like a conspiracy theorist.Trump is a counterpuncher; he should create an index of all the smears that are being thrown at him, and with each he should associate a different Clinton scandal which not only is patently worse than the spitball that she - and/or the moderator - are slinging at him. Something which time has revealed is a valid charge.
For example, he is accused of bullying poor Miss Universe just because she egregiously violated her agreement to stay in shape for the duration of her “rein.” I would suggest that he point out that when she was in the White House Hillary ordered the FBI to persecute Billy Dale. Dale was found innocent of the fraudulent charges against him within two hours after the case went to the jury - and Hillary’s fingerprints were all over the decision to prosecute him.
But if you really want to lambaste Hillary, you ask her
Why did you hire Craig Livingstone? Hillary can deny it, and she can she can claim that there is no proof that she did it. But somebody in the White House did. And since Craig Livingstone got the treatment that Billy Dale deserved, and Billy Dale got the treatment at Hillary’s hands that Craig Livingstone deserved, Hillary is the prime suspect but nobody who was in that White House at that time is above, or beneath, suspicion.
Nobody who was in the White House when Filegate went down should be considered for nomination, let along election, to the presidency.
I absolutely and completely disagree with all points you just tried to make... You would be surprised how many people know about it and believe it. It would also be effective.
Immediately after he is asked a question he should turn to her and hit her with a fact (Benghazi, Clinton Foundation, Bill's Bimbos, etc.)
He should expect no response from her, so he can then go about answering the question as if nothing unusual happened.
Ignore all warnings from the Hillary supporters acting as moderators.
Nobody who was in the White House when Filegate went down should be considered for nomination, let along election, to the presidency.
America wants to know why she lied to us about the video causing the murders in Benghazi but emailed her daughter and Egypt the truth. Why did she lie!
Point blank....he needs to ask her why her first response was to lie. Ask her why does she always turn to lying first!
One of his super-PACs need to get a commercial out showing a few 12 year old girls playing in a schoolyard. Laughing and playing like little girls do. Then....blend into a voice-over of Hillary’s own voice describing the little girl that was “brutally” RAPED by her client, A GROWN, ADULT MAN.
An adult man that raped a child, Hillary laughed about helping to set him free. No remorse, just a big ole’ laugh to her.
He has all that information, all the things mentioned in this thread, and the following night at his evening rally, he lit her up...With extreme prejudice!
His style (for the first debate) was not to allow the first time viewing public to percieve of him as being a big bully. Hillary came off as a corrupt smug insider. Many of the drive-by media claimed she won the debate on points, but Trump gained votes.
On another post-debate thread, a fellow FReeper stated that he won the debate by "losing" the debate.
All these are older than half the undecided voters. There are plenty of current issues. Email-gate, Arab Spring and the Clinton Foundation. Americans have the attention span of fleas. Three topics; three hundred times. Game, Set, Match...
“calm grownup”
Those are good points. One common thing that low info left leaning voters I talk to seem to share: they think Trump is “dangerous”.
So you’re right. He should slowly, calmly rattle her cage until her inner Nurse Ratched emerges. She almost lost it a few times but then it seemed to me that she remembered it was a rigged game, a sure thing.
Trump in the “debate” Monday reminded me of a guy who slowly starts to realize that the guy who was so bad warming up on the table is now making shots. And knows the warp and woof of the table, because it’s his table.
And when it was his turn, Trump was handed a warped cue and a loaded cue ball and was heckled while he tried to shoot. That grift works one time with a savvy player.
More for Donald and/or his #TeamTrump:
- Just like you’ve done with the black community, call up Milo and other gays. If Milo can promise to avoid Daddy jokes, invite him and others to meet with you. (The man has a deeply serious side and is very intelligent. He can help you.) You need to be able to say “L-G-B-T-Q” a little more smoothly and be more familiar with their issues. Talk to him about gay concerns and find out exactly why many of them are supporting you. Then use that knowledge to get their support. To avoid pissing off the Evangelicals, invite some of them to visit at the same time. Be a uniter among them. Gays + Minorities + Evangelicals = A Yuuuuge united tent that will put together a yuuuuge Inaugural Ball. ;-)
- Remind everyone of how this is our Brexit moment. It’s now or never. Explain how Hillary is much more Marxist than her husband ever was. She will not stop until she has regulated the gun & ammo industry into the ground, making it impossible for anyone but her, The Queen, to have guns for self-protection. Use one of the liberal states w/insane gun laws as an example. Find someone who has been victimized by these insane, unconstitutional laws and drag him/her on stage at a rally (the guy who was arrested with an empty magazine on his front seat, for example)
- Don’t be afraid to invite one of the Clinton’s victims for the front row, but it needs to be one of them who was truly a victim. My is Juanita Broaddrick. She deserves it more than any of them, imo. She’s truly a classy lady who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
- Ask her why she ignores her stepson, Danney. (ok, maybe that’s a bit too much, but we all feel for the guy who was abandoned by his pervert rapist father, and we followed him years ago when he was a little boy).
- Can we at least arrange for a DNA test on Bill? lol.
Her history of helping start wars and destabilize nations.
Is she wanted for crimes against humanity anywhere?
OK -- fine.
The problem is that every one of them is either already voting for Trump, or is such a pathological mutant that they're voting for Clinton anyway.
This type of story is simply too far in the past, too disconnected from the 2016 version of Hillary Clinton, and too difficult to explain clearly to make a difference to voters who never heard of these people.
I agree with the other poster who commented on a different thread, though ... Something as simple as describing the scenario where Hillary Clinton had more than a dozen Blackberries and iPhones, deleted thousands of e-mails and then had her staff use hammers to destroy the devices will absolutely resonate with people -- because everyone will wonder what normal person would ever do such a thing.
My favorite is Juanita Broaddrick.
A caller to Rush’s show today was exactly right. The theme for the next debate should be trust.
How can you trust her on....
terrorism?
defense?
immigration?
jobs?
national security?
the economy?
and how bad must Hillary be when everyone cheats and spins and looks the other way for her yet she’s still behind in almost any honest poll?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.