Posted on 10/03/2016 10:21:46 AM PDT by sevinufnine
WikiLeaks founder due to release damaging information about Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump's former right-hand man Roger Stone claimed the new WikiLeaks revelations would destroy Clinton's campaign.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange cancelled a planned appearance to mark the 10th anniversary of his organization from the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy in London over security fears on Monday.
He had been planning to give a speech - amid claims he was about to release damaging information about Clinton which some claimed could be an 'October Surprise' which would swing the presidential election.
In August this year, Assange told Fox News that he was holding information on Clinton which yielded 'some quite unexpected angles, that are quite interesting, some even entertaining'.
He said he would release the information before the November 8 election.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
To some extent freedom of speech is curtailed. If you work for a government agency you couldn’t endorse a candidate running for office, for instance, when I worked for the County as a mere secretary. I think the Unions curtail freedom of speech, too, and lots of other entities (banks come to mind). If you can lose your job for voicing a\ true opinion, based on fact, you have lost freedom of speech.
There is such an informative, factual article today on Citizen Wells about Obummer being born in Kenya. And Hillary going over to England and pulling his birth records (Kenyan records were kept in England at that time he was born), and then having his birth records (which were freely available that day) sealed with an obscure law, for at least the duration of his Presidency. When Hillary returned she was made Secretary of State, what a co-inkydink.
Ha, what core supporters!?
She is so disliked bigtime.
Me too. The media keeps flip flopping. This is why people should never announce that they will say something - they should just say it.
what is wrong with using the password: password anyway?
I agree that she wouldn't easy be persuaded to step down, but there are a lot of possibilities and the DNC particularly in NJ, has used this as a strategy.
I am beginning to suspect he has nothing. Lots of drama for nothing.
just because most americans dont give a #### doesn’t mean he hasn’t released some incredibly damaging info.
He can’t force the majority to care about their own country.
This is wikileaks’ tenth anniversary. That Assange will drop a hammer on Hillary is mere speculation, as far as I can tell. I don’t see that he has made such a claim about the tenth anniversary interview. But plenty of bloggers are making that claim.
This post should be the front page story in every American newspaper.
But it won’t be, because in the last part where you list what this terrorist organization controls, you forgot to mention the media.
Great post and thanks for posting. I hope it is reposted everywhere. And often.
I could forgive the hostile attitude toward Assange if it stemmed from patriotism and the desire to protect the US and its citizens. But that’s not where it comes from. The hostility comes from the desire of Clinton and 0vomit to cover up their criminal and treasonous acts.
I don’t like some of his rhetoric. He sounds too much like this is partisan to him, and leaves him open for that criticism. But if he really has good dirt, I am glad to see it.
She has US citizens knocked off, so foreigners I assume are no problem for her. I was talking to a friend of mine last week, and he said to me “Do you realize there is not a crime that exists that the Clintons have NOT been involved in?” It’s true, they’ve done it all haven’t they. Murder, rape, sexual assault, theft, racketeering, sex with children (Bills jaunt to pedo Island), fraud, accepting bribes, espionage (who are we kidding, that’s exactly why Hillary moved classified info) treason, drugs (Roger Clinton, witnesses who said cocaine flowed freely in the Clinton White house).. I really can’t think of any crime they haven’t been attached to, maybe bank robbery or armed robbery, but they rob in different ways, and incredibly people want them back in the White house.
It became a clinton talking point, I suspect to link Trump to russia. I haven't seen or heard of any solid proof it was russia. It could’ve been any of a half dozen or so countries, or maybe a 400 lb fat kid sitting on his bed. None of the servers used by the dems or clinton’s slobbering followers were all that secure, after all, they have simpletons trying to use them.
While it is almost certain Hillary's emails were hacked and the information stolen by multiple countries, spy agencies or private hackers, there is a second, even more damaging way the information could be disclosed.
From what has been published by Assange already, we see that there were Hillary emails on the DNC server that had been supplied to the DNC opposition research and clean up crew to locate and destroy or cover up any and all damaging Hillary information that could be located and destroyed such as documents, incriminating e mail chains for which multiple recipients and cc.ed senders and recipients had to coordinate their deletion and destruction of email chains to destroy all evidence..
They also developed pre scripted talking points for media and Democrat politicians and operatives to do damage control if any leaks happened. They also helped formulate plans to short circuit the Benghazi and other investigations.
This was all done long before Hillary even won the Democrat nomination.
This means that a large fraction of the most damaging Hilary Clinton and Clinton Foundation emails and documents were in the possession of the DNC on the DNC server that was leaked to Wikileaks.
A very distressed Donna Brazile has already admitted that the DNC server leaker “got everything” and there would be a lot more coming out in an interview when she took over as Chair of the DNC.
This would include all of the damaging stuff Hillary gave to the opposition research group for triage, cover up and clean up operations.
So Assange is almost certainly in possession of all of the Clinton server docs and emails and Clinton Foundation documents and emails that Hillary turned over to the State Dept but that the FBI, Dept of Justice and FBI have been hiding, refusing to disclose or slow walking.
These emails and documents would be in their “original” and un redacted form, possibly with the crucial meta data intact.
Assange may also have many of the already FOIA released and published emails in their un redacted form with meta data which could be illuminating.
Assange may also have some of the pay for play docs which accompany the what play the DNC was offering to the Clinton's for their pay in order to prioritized the competing demands for payoffs from Clinton Cronies pre existing commitments and also to the DNC own list of cronies demanding to be taken care of.
Any evidence that Hillary or Mills transferred stolen government documents, records or secret information from her servers to the DNC for clean up, cover up and disposal would be very bad for not just the Clinton Mafia but the DNC as well.
If Assange has any proof that foreign spy agencies also have the contents of the Clinton server, then Hillary is in real trouble, especially since Assange seems to also have a lot off hacked information from the other co conspirators communications which expand upon and explain anything on the Clinton Server
Donna Brazile has been acting pretty bizarre lately. Perhaps she has a pretty good idea of what is going to hit the fan
I just pray that it is a blockbuster, but given the build up, I’m afraid that there is going to be a let down.
“I wouldn’t bet any money on anything important coming out”.
Was there anything important in the DNC or last months dump? Yes,,,,
“I am beginning to suspect he has nothing. Lots of drama for nothing”
I guess the DNC e-mails were not important to you?
For cryin’ out loud dude just release the f’ing thing already, will ya? Enough with the suspense!
Hillary wanted Obama to kill him....He chose to not pose for a CIA bullet.
These NAZI CRIMINALS have taken taken over our federal government......
You don’t believe it? ......WHAT IS SNOWDEN TELLING US?
Not so sure here.
One of the more telling clues is the recent behavior of Donna Brazile.
She is euphoric and buoyant.
The Clintons and Obama have pretty much declared Donna Brazile persona no grata and frozen her out of any really important job function and banished her to the political wilderness.
As such an out of the loop player, Brazile is one of the few prominent Democrats not implicated in the storm that is about to hit. This is probably why she was given the position at the DNC - she is the only Democrat of any stature who possesses the two qualifications needed to replace DWS as DNC Chair in this time of crisis .
One, she is one of the few who has clean hands in this mess by virtue of banishment to the wilderness and two, she is also the only high level, high profile Democrat desperate enough to take the job of Hillary's sewer unplugger
Her manic state of mind suggests she knows she has dodged a bullet and has been brought back from the political dead and now can watch her enemies and tormenters go down in flames while she sits and watches from a comfortable seat as DNC Chairman and titular head of the Democrat Party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.