I disagree with the premise of the article that they mistimed this. The real problem is that they mis-overestimated the public perception and grossly mis-underestimated the reaction [profound anger by the voting public for this not-very-cute stunt]. Surely the guys and gals who use salty language in the office know that guys and gals use salty language.
I think the timing was keyed to the wikileaks dump...which is a treasure trove of HRC wrongdoing. They had it in reserve, and used it when needed.
I would agree with you....they really don’t know the public in 2016. They assume everyone is living in the 1980s era and this would shock them. Face it....on HBO, Showtime, and a even the 3-letter networks....you get a dose of the word “Pu$$y” at least six times a week. Virtually every single boy by age 8 knows the word and what it refers to.
I hate to even suggest this, but 90-percent of black guys might admire him for saying that comment, and it might convince them to vote for the guy.
As for the comeback? I would ask what the Hillary platform angle is for “Pu$$y”....is she for it or against it?