Posted on 10/09/2016 1:24:40 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
...
Now, networks report, Clintonia also has sought executive privilege for the first lady's talks with aides about the women. This bolsters two suspicions: That the White House wants to drag this scandal out and that the Clintons don't want the public to know about their role in smearing the president's women.
...
It was one thing for the White House to release letters Willey wrote to the president after she alleges he groped her -- even while it can't find other sought-after documents concerning Lewinsky. But certain leaked stories -- a friend says Willey lied about being pregnant to get back at a former lover, Willey denies it -- seem designed specifically to scare off other women. The recently released Jones' brief includes Jane Does who have seen what happens to women who talk about Bill Clinton.
Some feminists have begun making excuses for the president that could hurt working women. Feminist Steinem wrote a piece in Sunday's New York Times,in which she said she believed all the women's accusations against Clinton "for the sake of argument." Willey has claimed the president fondled her breast and placed her hand on his crotch. Nonetheless, Steinem wrote that Clinton "took 'no' for an answer." Brutes have cause to rejoice: Feminists have concocted a One Free Grope defense.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
about Clinton’s mistresses being pregnant...
Gennifer flowers was pregnant and Bill Clinton made her have an abortion...
BTW just what was the reason the Baptist Church in Arkansas threw the Clintons out ???
Has any other former president claimed “executive privilege” after his term is over?
This article is from 1998 during the height of the scandals.
The outrage expressed by the left is not sincere. They not only condoned dirty talk, but sexual assault itself. Their offense is at Trump’s current party affiliation vs. what he said. I even remember a report on a news channel portraying Republicans as out of touch, going around interviewing women saying what Clinton did was okay with Paula Jones “He presented himself to her and she said no and left. There’s nothing wrong with that” as though it was normal behavior and those who thought otherwise were simply out of touch. They also ran stories about how “many couples find that cheating helps them recharge their marriage”, etc. Taking advantage of a young girl half his age was also okay - “just a little hanky panky” it was portrayed as. Those who thought it was inappropriate were made out to be the weirdos. Remember it all like it was yesterday during that time period. It’s extraordinary what a mere difference in voter registration can make in what is permissible - and even apparently a good thing - as long as you are a Democrat.
not one story.
nothing on this pic.
Google Huma hugging Hillary
This is the source: http://blurbrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Huma-hug-Hillary.jpg
Why would the MSM write a story about two queer broads?
Here’s the source for the picture.
http://blurbrain.com/post-debate-video-no-hugs-for-huma/
Remember this?
Look closely- that is Frau Merkel with the young woman who looks similar to Huma. Maybe this is why Hillary named Merkel as her fav foreign leader - they have similar tastes.
seems like yesterday
I must resist!
I don't want another timeout!!
I applaud your restraint!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.