Posted on 10/14/2016 9:12:00 AM PDT by xzins
And in this news from the lame stream media on this subject?
Crickets, NOTHING.
Even with a reasonable D+2 poll, the polling outfit can skew the results to maximum the outcome for any candidate they want. In this case, Hillary, because *no* media outlet is going to report Trump+6, even if that were true.
I have not heard “bimbo eruptions” since the 90s. Trump ought to use it. I believe that phrase was used by Hillary.
Not sure how reliable this is but here’s something to add:
https://twitter.com/0HOUR1__/status/786979683942424577
https://twitter.com/0HOUR1__/status/786981503628697600
I think it’s because he has never been an elected official that makes him appealing to a lot of voters.
The other polls are not “lying”.
Their turnout model derives from 2012 turnout, or worse, 2012 registration. D registration was +9 in 2012. It has to come from Gallup because many states register voters with no party affiliation.
New Jersey I could believe.
Massachusetts, no, I can’t see any confirmation of that one.
thanks for the links though
I think the voters see that Hillary’s only line of attack is to concoct “Bimbo Eruptions” on Trump and I think it’s beginning to backfire. Hillary is going back into hiding and the First Lady and the president start attacking Trump on the woman issue, and lo and behold more bimbos coming out of the woodwork. So predictable. The Dems have nothing else to fight with.
I can’t speak to individual states, but in the past 5-6 presidential elections, Dems had about a 5-8% advantage. With motivation this year, I expect that closer to the lower end, but Dems will have the advantage. Also Independents are creeping up a bit.
I can’t speak to individual states, but in the past 5-6 presidential elections, Dems had about a 5-8% advantage. With motivation this year, I expect that closer to the lower end, but Dems will have the advantage. Also Independents are creeping up a bit.
Not trying to rain on anyone’s parade here but keep in mind Rasmussen had Romney leading Obama by 2 up to election day 2012. Not saying it’s wrong just that we need to be careful with Rasmussen
And PPD is the most accurate over the last two elections, and they have Trump up today. The Fox poll has Trump down but is gives Dems something crazy like +9.
Also, iirc, Rasmussen was sold and is under a different leadership.
It's still their best play.
Showing Trump erasing Hillary's lead is a worse narrative for them, but they'll probably settle for that when accurate turnout models are suddenly used just before the election.
The Revolution is ON!
Vote Trump!
The Gallup 1980 trick was to poll just before the election—finally showing a Reagan lead—but not publishing it until after the election!
No scam is too low for the dirtbag pollsters!
Too late. I already voted for him. :-)
“And PPD is the most accurate over the last two elections”
-—Could be wrong but I think you meant PPP poll they have been touted as the most accurate 2012
Yes, you are correct. I mean PPP.
Too many p’s in polling out there. :>)
It is PPD that has Trump up. With Rasmussen and Dornsife.
PPP seems not to have had a national poll since late September after the 1st debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.