Looks like new wikileaks dump out. 10/16/2016 (FYI)

https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult ^

[loucon]

Date Release Date From To Subject: Re: Girls night 2015-11-16 00:33 2016-10-16 kschake@hillaryclinton.com john.podesta@gmail.com Subject: A Special Offer for Our Members – the New CleanWater Card 2011-10-04 14:06 2016-10-16 activist@cleanwater.org john.podesta@gmail.com Subject: Dr. Anwar/Dr. Kahn call tomorrow 2015-08-04 04:14 2016-10-16 mfisher@hillaryclinton.com john.podesta@gmail.com

[The G Man]

Here’s a fun one. Doug Band emailing Podesta and Cheryl Mills about Chelsea:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11472

“She sends me one of these types of emails every few days/week

As they say, the apple doesn’t fall far

A kiss on the cheek while she is sticking a knife in the back, and front”

[TigerClaws]

CNN says it’s illegal for you to read the emails. They’ll do it for us.

https://streamable.com/6g5v

[nuconvert]

“the apple doesn’t fall far. A kiss on the cheek while she is sticking a knife in the back, and front”

He certainly knows Hillary

[cgbg]

Thanks.

"Let's get ready to rumble....."

[TangledUpInBlue]

Why does it say from Diane Reynolds?

[ScaniaBoy]

Some background on Doug Band:

https://newrepublic.com/article/114790/how-doug-band-drove-wedge-through-clinton-dynasty

[The G Man]

“Diane Reynolds” is Chelsea’s alias when emailing

[ScaniaBoy]

Diane Reynolds = Chelsea Clinton

It is one of her aliases. (!!!)

[petercooper]

BTTT

[cgbg]

A little inside baseball on the emails:

From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: ntanden@gmail.com br.
Date: 2015-08-22 11:24 Subject: Re: Emails - my thoughts

Jen and I are in the same place. Trying to figure out how to get her there and best way to execute.


On Saturday, August 22, 2015, Neera Tanden wrote: > >

I know this email thing isn't on the level. I'm fully aware of that. But > her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine > feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem > (more so than honesty). > > People hate her arrogant, like her down. It's a sexist context, but I > think it's the truth. I see no downside in her actually just saying, look, > I'm sorry. I think it will take so much air out of this. > > She always sees herself bending to "their" will when she hands over > information, etc. But the way she has to bend here is in the remorse. Not > the "if I had to do it all over again, I wouldn't do it." A real feeling > of - this decision I made created a mess and I'm sorry I did that. > >

No one thinks she doesn't have the judgment to be president - she's not > reaffirming a negative characteristic in saying sorry. She needs to do > that - I see no way of moving on until October otherwise. > > Anyway, that's my advice.

[CincyRichieRich]

We need to parse these for Trump...his folks need our help. Trump camp here is one taking black vote for granted, treating blacks like little children. Good tweet material. .......... Re: black vote From:fwj77@comcast.net To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2016-02-26 00:28 Subject: Re: black vote How can I help? ----- Original Message ----- From: John Podesta To: fwj77@comcast.net Sent: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 02:17:51 -0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: black vote I have been working on that and will resolve soon. We need to strengthen the overall structure and this is the most critical piece of that. Right now I think we should do this right after Super Tuesday. On Thursday, February 25, 2016, wrote: > The black is obvious super critical. Im hearing the same complaint in > political circles that i continue to hear while fundraising. "The campaign > doesnt value black folks and takes us for granted". > > Can I make a suggestion? > > A black campaign vice chair or Sr advisor would go a long way during the > primary and send the message that, Hillary puts her actions where her mouth > is, and actually does appreciate the black vote. >

[mewzilla]

https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/9759

Fwd: Catholic Efforts on Iran Update

[CincyRichieRich]

A coded one about classified emails.
....
eaks
Shop Donate Submit
Search
Leaks News About Partners
Return to search

View email
View source

De-Classify

From:Bonnie.Hammer@nbcuni.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-02-20 17:33 Subject: De-Classify

Hi John, Was following your tweets and had to chuckle when I read your comment about de-classifying the classified docs — brought back many fun SciFi memories. Hope all is well... And, look forward to hopefully seeing you again, perhaps, this time, during Hillary’s run! Best, Bonnie

[Rusty0604]

I wonder if their viewers actually believe that.

[cgbg]

Here is one--this would have been one line of attack on Ted Cruz--and with Hillary's media "friends" you better believe it would have "stuck":

From:pir@hrcoffice.com To: jake.sullivan@gmail.com, jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-23 10:05

Subject: Re: NYT piece

1st candidate for the top job jumped into the race today. really early announcement.

didn't realize canada also had an election coming up.

From: Jake Sullivan Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:03 AM br>
To: Jennifer Palmieri Cc: Philippe Reines; Cheryl Mills; Nick Merrill; John Podesta; David Kendall; Heather Samuelson

Subject: Re: NYT piece
br>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Jennifer Palmieri > wrote:

Good idea re sending mika the statement, will do that. Mulling Cruz, could be good if we had something meaningful or really funny to say.

Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:40 AM, Jake Sullivan > wrote: > >

What do you guys think about HRC saying something about Cruz today? Some kind of light hearted contrast? Would make news. > >

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11136

Wow, just wow!

Re: Emails - my thoughts

From: john.podesta@gmail.com
To: ntanden@gmail.com
Date: 2015-08-22 11:24
Subject: Re: Emails -

my thoughts Jen and I are in the same place. Trying to figure out how to get her there and best way to execute.

On Saturday, August 22, 2015, Neera Tanden wrote:

I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that. But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty).

People hate her arrogant, like her down. It’s a sexist context, but I think it’s the truth. I see no downside in her actually just saying, look, I’m sorry. I think it will take so much air out of this.

She always sees herself bending to “their” will when she hands over information, etc. But the way she has to bend here is in the remorse. Not the “if I had to do it all over again, I wouldn’t do it.”

A real feeling of - this decision I made created a mess and I’m sorry I did that.

No one thinks she doesn’t have the judgment to be president - she’s not reaffirming a negative characteristic in saying sorry.

She needs to do that - I see no way of moving on until October otherwise. Anyway, that’s my advice.

[newfreep]

I have not seen THE kill shot - just "inside baseball" stuff.

The Beast's supporters will ignore the technical stuff and need a real KILL SHOT to even begin considering not voting for the commie.

[Stentor]

The Beast's supporters will ignore the technical stuff and need a real KILL SHOT to even begin considering not voting for the commie.

If the head of the FBI reading a list of your felonies for 15 minutes isn't a KILL SHOT, then there is none.

[CincyRichieRich]

Does the Trump camp have a data mining tool for key words? 241 pages of emails will take forever.