Posted on 10/19/2016 8:39:37 AM PDT by MNDude
To Okeefe (from daveweige at Washington Post): Now, if you end up proving that Obama had dozens on meetings on how to steal elections, I will shine your Pulitzer.
Okeefe: I'll do better. And shouldn't this be YOUR job at the @washingtonpost to expose? I'd never accept a bs Pulitzer from such a corrupt media.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Having another civil war here is preferable to letting the Democrats start a war with Russia. The election WILL have enough voter fraud that should Trump lose, he shouldn’t concede until every vote in America is verified, no matter how long it takes.
O’Keefe is being ignored by the lamestream media; you can bet if Republicans were exposed doing this, it’d be all over.
Where is the GOP on this?
The GOP is with the DNC.
But it's all just conservative lies, talking points, partisan witch hunts, and smear campaigns. /s
O’Keefe is “discredited” because he pled guilty to a having taped the image and voice of an Acorn guy a few election cycles ago without his consent, which is a misdemeanor in California.
But NBC is not “discredited” for having violated California statutes by surreptitiously taping Trump being egged on to talk dirty about women 10 years ago (which was prior to O’Keefe’s actions).
The mainstream media has played the Trump tape over and over and over and over and over and over, edited for maximum shock value, safe in the knowledge that no charges will be filed against them because, after all, Trump is a “public figure.”
But the media won’t touch O’Keefe’s latest videos because he is a “discredited” criminal who “edits” his material to make his subjects say stuff they didn’t honestly mean about things they haven’t actually done to influence events that never truly happened.
And Creamer and Fovel haven’t actually been fired. They’ve just “stepped back.”
O’Keefe is “discredited” because he pled guilty to a having taped the image and voice of an Acorn guy a few election cycles ago without his consent, which is a misdemeanor in California.
But NBC is not “discredited” for having violated California statutes by surreptitiously taping Trump being egged on to talk dirty about women 10 years ago (which was prior to O’Keefe’s actions).
The mainstream media has played the Trump tape over and over and over and over and over and over, edited for maximum shock value, safe in the knowledge that no charges will be filed against them because, after all, Trump is a “public figure.”
But the media won’t touch O’Keefe’s latest videos because he is a “discredited” criminal who “edits” his material to make his subjects say stuff they didn’t honestly mean about things they haven’t actually done to influence events that never truly happened.
And Creamer and Fovel haven’t actually been fired. They’ve just “stepped back.”
There is one day in 2013 when Creamer and Foval met with Obamaturd back to back.
The next step up would be the person who did the firing gets fired.
Well, THEY ARE REPEATING!......AD INFINITUM
Seriously now, LOL, if hill said the "N" word, it would be classified as a term of endearment.
Right now, I think, if it comes out that hill did a true honest pure God driven good deed, her numbers would go down. Right now her so called good deeds are wrapped in corruption so they don't matter.
Ask them. Time to start pounding your GOP Congress critter(s) on their silence. I just sent an email to my rep. The heat needs to be turned up on these people.
O’Keefe fights hard I’ll give him that but he never gets anything that sticks to the big dogs. I’d shine his car everyday if he could break something that makes a difference.
.....maybe a face plant UPON the podium.................
Ever think the GOP may be in on this as an ordained #2 party working toward a globalist goal in exchange for great personal wealth and power?
.
Maybe you don’t know what a “smoking gun” looks like?
.
Perfect!
truth !
Here is an excellent video from him that puts things in the proper perspective:
"Black Lives Matter Kills People" by Bill Whittle
It is a 7 minute video which puts it in context, and explains much.
So what if Obama held only 1 meeting on how to rig elections?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.