Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton says she has 'no concerns' that Trump will try to jailher
Daily Mail UK ^ | October 23, 2016 | By Francesca Chambers

Posted on 10/23/2016 7:49:49 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: \/\/ayne

Al Capone


61 posted on 10/23/2016 12:50:19 PM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
There is nothing in the Constitution that says a president's pardon can come before adjudication of the wrong. This is simple to understand, because a crime has not been provably committed until a court rules it was.

Look at your law: We stay innocent until proven guilty.

62 posted on 10/23/2016 1:12:52 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Ford’s pardon of Nixon was never challenged in court, and it was tacitly implied that if it was challenged, Ford would still be president for a few years and would just pardon Nixon for any convictions anyway, so the issue was left alone. In my opinion, a presidential blanket pardon isn’t ‘settled law’ at all, and the elephant in the room has just been ignored for forty years.


63 posted on 10/23/2016 1:14:07 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I agree with you. I would think that a blanket pardon in regards to all federal statutes applying to a certain action might be permissible. For example, and I don’t recall his exact verbiage, but it Ford pardoned Nixon for all crimes related to Watergate, then that might be legal. I can’t see a president being able to pardon someone for the rest of their lives for all federal crimes in the past, present, and future.


64 posted on 10/23/2016 1:21:33 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

She’s going to leave the country if she looses so why would she be worried?


65 posted on 10/23/2016 1:44:17 PM PDT by wattojawa (If you raise a 0 to a higher power it remains a 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Read the Heritage link above.


66 posted on 10/23/2016 5:21:04 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Your link gives me the whole Constitution.

I’ve read that before. My stance is correct.


67 posted on 10/23/2016 5:38:10 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

You must have pop-ups blocked. Their analysis includes the Founders commentary. It is contrary any your position.


68 posted on 10/23/2016 6:37:44 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
My popup blocker was indeed keeping it from showing.

From “Pardon Power”

“A reprieve is the commutation or lessening of a sentence already imposed; it does not affect the legal guilt of a person. A pardon, however, completely wipes out the legal effects of a conviction. A pardon can be issued from the time an offense is committed, and can even be issued after the full sentence has been served.”

It appears that, as of 1867, pardons could be performed for persons who committed crimes which were not yet known, but performed before the pardon occurred.

I stand corrected, unfortunately. This means the Clintons can be kept from all harms they've ever done, forever.

We will have to go after the Clinton Foundation and any new crimes they commit, going forward.

This is disgusting.

69 posted on 10/23/2016 8:19:04 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

For additional reference:

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/05/opinion/l-constitution-allows-pardons-before-conviction-590688.html


70 posted on 10/23/2016 8:19:44 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson