Watch "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY (19.46 min)
:/
And then step two was to declare the election over.
None of this shit matters...never did, never will.
The only poll that matters is the one on election day.
SO GET OUT THERE AND VOTE!!!
That’s all we can do.
AND WEAR RED!
I was just going to post this here but I see it is here already and not a moment too soon.
I saw earlier threads here of discouraged people regarding the barrage of polls showing the hag ahead.
Don’t give up vote and fight the good fight!
MAGA
The elites may have to eat this election the way they had to eat Reagan's unanticipated win. Their conundrum: Trump will shred their neat little charade, while Reagan's NWO puppets were trusted an merely waited out Poppy Bush....
All of which explains the current bi-partisan establishment's transparent desperation, collusion and corruption.
Well, well. (Not as if we did not suspect)
Broken glass, lady, broken glass.
Three days before the primary in California the media declared Hillary Clinton the winner over Bernie Sanders. Sanders people were really mad about it.
Watch "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY (19.46 min)
:/
Also on scribd.
Alinsky lives!
CTR is Correct the Record, a Donk Super PAC.
Sheeple (noun) people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led. (a portmanteau of “sheep” and “people”) a derogatory term that highlights the passive herd behavior of people easily controlled by a governing power which likens them to sheep, a herd animal that is easily led about. “by the time the sheeple wake up and try to change things, it will be too late”
btt to follow
Broken Glass!
bookmark
So if you get polled, say that you *were* going to vote HRC, but now that she’s already won, no need to go vote at all.
Where is that document from? I am not seeing even mild sourcing on it.
And ...
documents and emails at this stage in time could very well be written with the expectation of hacking and leaking ...
just sayin’
How many of the zotted ones got paid for posting this crap on FR?
How many of the concerned trolls have been paid to post this crap on FR?
Most freepers have been aware of this Nazi propaganda technique and have ignored the defeat of Trump by the mediots for a long time.
A dispatch from the ENTHUSIASM FRONT LINES; cheating in online polls reveals Clinton’s problem
The Coach’s Team ^ | 10/24/16 | Kevin “Coach” Collins
Posted on 10/24/2016, 8:54:57 AM by Oldpuppymax
This is the opening line from the conservative website Brietbart.com in its response to the initial lopsided vote for Hillary Clinton after the third presidential debate last Wednesday night: “Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has overtaken Hillary Clinton on a Breitbart debate poll, despite a stream of overseas Clinton bots skewing the results in favor of the Democratic nominee.”
Let that set in; they used electronic “bots” to vote against Trump. They HAD to do that because they KNEW there is NO ENTHUSIASM FOR HILLARY CLINTON; so they had to manufacture enthusiasm with an electronic trick to make up for the short fall they knew was coming.
When Hillary Clinton got wiped out across all online polls (except for a few that registered less than a couple hundred votes) after the first presidential debate, they knew their worst fears about her enthusiasm gap were true. As the numbers came in it became abundantly clear that nobody is excited about her.
Moreover, any doubt about this problem’s existence was blown away when Democrat Vice Presidential Candidate Senator Tim Kaine was crushed under a 95/5 vote on the biggest poll.
So the Left did what it is all about – they cheated to try to win. But the enthusiasm gap has apparently grown so large that they had to pick just a few sites to try to “fix” in Clinton’s favor. They went after the number one conservative site’s poll, the one run by breitbart.com.
The story picks up with the continuation of Breitbart’s response...
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3484249/posts
New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through “Oversamples”
Zero Hedge ^ | 23 October 2016 | Tyler Durden
Posted on 10/24/2016, 9:14:36 AM by Lorianne
Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats.
“METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents
Of course, while democrats may enjoy a slight registration advantage of a couple of points, it is nowhere near the 9 points reflected in this latest poll.
Meanwhile, we also pointed out that with huge variances in preference across demographics one can easily “rig” a poll by over indexing to one group vs. another. As a quick example, the ABC / WaPo poll found that Hillary enjoys a 79-point advantage over Trump with black voters. Therefore, even a small “oversample” of black voters of 5% could swing the overall poll by 3 full points. Moreover, the pollsters don’t provide data on the demographic mix of their polls which makes it impossible to “fact check” the bias...convenient.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3484264/posts
You see it especially in the new Amazon/Disney (WaPost/ABC) tracking poll that they just started tbis week.
Bump