Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FBI’s October Surprise Is Devastating for Hillary Clinton
National Review ^ | 10/28/16 | David French

Posted on 10/28/2016 5:23:03 PM PDT by randita

The Democratic presidential nominee is again under criminal investigation less than two weeks before the election. On Friday afternoon, the FBI uncorked the mother of all October surprises, announcing in a letter to Congress that it has re-opened its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s “personal email server.” The reason? During an “unrelated investigation”* it uncovered e-mails that “appear to be pertinent” to Clinton’s case. It is seeking to determine whether the e-mails contain classified information and can’t yet determine their significance.

Stripped of the legalese, it means that Hillary is back in legal jeopardy. The FBI doesn’t investigate and recommend enforcement actions against computer servers. It holds people accountable, and Hillary is the person most responsible for her own e-mail. I have three initial thoughts.

First, these e-mails must be prima facie problematic. There is no way the FBI publicly re-opens this investigation on the eve of a presidential election if the new e-mails contained information about yoga routines or wedding plans. Moreover, the very fact that the FBI is trying to determine whether the e-mails contain classified information indicates that their content is setting off alarm bells in the Bureau. In other words, this is serious.

Second, the e-mails could have an impact on the decision whether to charge Hillary or her aides either under the Espionage Act or for obstructing the initial investigation, perhaps by lying to the FBI. Recall that Comey previously exonerated Clinton under a made-up legal standard, but if there are more e-mails — and if Clinton or her aides worked to conceal their existence from the FBI — then their conduct may even rise to the FBI’s arbitrary, higher threshold of lawlessness. At the very least, it renders the FBI’s previous decision not to prosecute even more suspect.

Third, unless the FBI announces the investigation and clears her within the span of basically one work week (an action that would be deeply problematic on its own terms), Hillary’s closing argument to the American people is going to be that Donald Trump is so dangerous that it’s worth gambling your vote on a woman under current criminal investigation.

Will there be any Democrats who will urge Clinton to step aside? Exactly three weeks ago, the Washington Post released tapes showing Donald Trump bragging about committing actions that easily meet the legal test for sexual battery. In the aftermath, a number of Republicans asked him to step aside for the good of the country. Now it’s the Democrats’ turn. Their candidate is back under criminal investigation.

Millions of people have already cast votes for her believing she’d been “cleared.” Is her personal ambition worth this national pain? *Update: It turns out the “unrelated investigation” that triggered the FBI’s decision was its investigation into Anthony Weiner’s serial sexting.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; emailgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Terry Mross

Sounds to me like Comey’s subordinates told him, in no uncertain terms, that they would expose the cover-up if he did not allow the new investigation to continue.


41 posted on 10/28/2016 5:40:11 PM PDT by politicket (1 1/2 million attended Obama's coronation - only 14 missed work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

“Somewhere, the ghost of Richard Nixon is laughing his ass off........”

Yes, he is.


42 posted on 10/28/2016 5:40:12 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randita

Probably not. All of her bottom feeding freeloaders have each already cast 4 or 5 ballots.


43 posted on 10/28/2016 5:42:23 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clintoon will be the "historical" first unindicted felon to sit in the Oval Office. Be proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934

Comey has until next Friday. Assange’s pertinent jail Hillary Emails will be released then. The ones Comey is ‘investigating’


44 posted on 10/28/2016 5:42:52 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger

Excellent point.


45 posted on 10/28/2016 5:43:33 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JIM O

Nasty!


46 posted on 10/28/2016 5:44:36 PM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934

Comey trying to save his a..


47 posted on 10/28/2016 5:45:25 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randita

I think this is a ploy to help explain the “tightening of the polls” in order to create enough believability in the polls to substantiate their getting away with stealing the election.


48 posted on 10/28/2016 5:46:29 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934
I would guess that Comey was threatened. That's the only reason that he would have gone public. Obviously, when the FBI confiscated the computer, Hillary and Huma knew what was on it. In other words....they didn't learn it from the news.

Obama's lying low.

49 posted on 10/28/2016 5:48:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

...or Scalia in some form or another.


50 posted on 10/28/2016 5:51:46 PM PDT by madison10 (Praying for team Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: randita

But still Never Trump, right, NR pissants?


51 posted on 10/28/2016 5:51:58 PM PDT by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

I believe we’re talking about computers....and yes, phones, too.


52 posted on 10/28/2016 5:52:26 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: randita

Well then the dirtbags at NR will just have to find another Democrat they can support.


53 posted on 10/28/2016 5:52:36 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I had a cool idea for a new tagline and I forgot it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

The FBI needs to arrest Hillary now if it wants to find out anything new. She will be a flight risk for sure, if she doesn’t win on November 8.


54 posted on 10/28/2016 5:53:11 PM PDT by Berosus (I wish I had as much faith in God as liberals have in government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

This is what the FBI found a Wienerville.
Several “servers” full of Clinton emails, huma and Wieners smart phones and the missing laptop that was supposedly was send to the State Dept. that the FBI was told was lost in the mail.

Not only is Huma and Illary on the hook for the transmission of classified material and most likely contained communication from Hillary instructing huma to destroy evidence, but also lieing to the FBI and hiding evidence.

Huma is now in a bind. She is gonna loose her immunity.

That’s my best guess.

I hope Comey has Huma on suicide watch. Those multiple gun shot cases seem to plague the Clinton circle of friends.


55 posted on 10/28/2016 5:54:09 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I don’t know if Trump had anything to do with this. I think a lot of people don’t like the Clintons. Including insiders.


56 posted on 10/28/2016 5:54:27 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pasr

Weiner’s phone is in custody of the NYPD. Somebody there found it and turned it over to the FBI. Comey wants to save his but when The Donald raises his right hand, and there you go.


57 posted on 10/28/2016 5:55:19 PM PDT by Gamecock (Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

LOL! Thank you for that! I just told a friend at work today that I was waiting for a house to fall on that old witch!


58 posted on 10/28/2016 5:55:45 PM PDT by AmericanMermaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

I’m starting to wonder if Clinton won’t flee before the election. Then again, it’s hard to believe she would give up a chance for absolute power.


59 posted on 10/28/2016 5:57:55 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
I think this is a ploy to help explain the “tightening of the polls” in order to create enough believability in the polls to substantiate their getting away with stealing the election

Nah, they didn't need to do this to help with that. They were already blaming wikileaks for the exact same thing. But you have a point that this is being reported big time by outlets that normally would just suppress it. Somebody really wanted to make this an issue for the Clinton campaign.

60 posted on 10/28/2016 5:58:57 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson