Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Trade vs. the Republican Party
The American Conservative ^ | May 2oth 2016 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 11/13/2016 6:32:49 AM PST by central_va

In the 1895 “History of the Republican Party,” the authors declare, “the Republican Party … is the party of protection … that carries the banner of protection proudly.” Under protectionist policies from 1865 to 1900, U.S. debt was cut by two-thirds. Customs duties provided 58 percent of revenue. Save for President Cleveland’s 2 percent tax, which was declared unconstitutional, there was no income tax. Commodity prices fell 58 percent. Real wages, despite a doubling of the population, rose 53 percent. Growth in GDP averaged over 4 percent a year. Industrial production rose almost 5 percent a year.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; free; freetrade; freetraitors; patbuchanan; sucks; trade; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: econjack

Exactly right. End the coordinated assault by big political donors on small-to-medium sized manufacturing businesses and the problem will resolve itself in a decade or less.


21 posted on 11/13/2016 7:08:29 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

We have to solidify the rust belt Reagan Democrats into the new Republican Party. We have to trade our tiny minority of anti American globalist Free Traitor™ hacks for the Reagan Democrats who are legion.


22 posted on 11/13/2016 7:09:54 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Bump for later.


23 posted on 11/13/2016 7:11:17 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is. Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Big Cap corps will have to be strong armed into repatriating industry and using US labor. Only a tariff will do that. Big Caps are leaving for slave wages.


24 posted on 11/13/2016 7:11:34 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Ryan is already on tv this morning skirting the question about tariffs to Mexico. No way the establishment in Washington will do anything.


25 posted on 11/13/2016 7:24:06 AM PST by MakeAmericaGr8tAgain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MakeAmericaGr8tAgain

Right, The “establishment” gets on board with protectionism or they will get crushed by the Trump revolution.


26 posted on 11/13/2016 7:27:49 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Excellent history lesson from Pat Buchanan. Thanks Pat.


27 posted on 11/13/2016 7:29:44 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

I voted for Pat back in the day. He saw what was coming, was ahead of his time. Unfortunately, America was blind at the time.


28 posted on 11/13/2016 7:34:16 AM PST by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It ain’t dead yet.


29 posted on 11/13/2016 7:36:01 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2

While I have always thought highly of Pat I couldn’t vote for him because running third party and given the fact that the press ripped him to shreds even before he ever announced his Presidential runs, he had a slimmer change than did Donald in this election. But I have no doubt he would have been a good one. Just the darn reality for him, much to this nation’s loss.


30 posted on 11/13/2016 7:40:10 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse

Free trade to the founding fathers was allowing merchants in the US to trade, without government restraint, with merchants in any country. Under British rule the British government placed certain countries off limits to colonial merchants, granted exclusive trading rights to some British companies, and restricted the use of foreign ships.

Free trade did not mean the elimination of tariffs. Tariffs and duties primarily funded the federal government until the income tax was passed in the early 1900’s. High tariffs were government policy in the 1700’s and 1800’s to fund the federal government and protect US factories while the nation was industrializing.

Despite high tariffs, American merchants and ships carried on a vigorous trade throughout the world. Yankee clipper ships were frequently seen in foreign ports. Americans exported lumber, fish, textiles, and leather goods. High tariffs were not an impediment to free movement of goods around the world on American ships. During the period from 1865 to 1900, US industry recovered from the ruin of a devastating civil war and grew rapidly resulting in the US developing into the greatest industrial nation in the world by 1900. The US economy flourished under high tariffs. The vibrant middle class formed during this period, the US led the world in technological innovation, entrepreneurship flourished and the standard of living rose dramatically.

Compare with the last 35 year period of reducing tariffs. The US manufacturing base has been decimated with the loss of millions of middle class jobs. Average household incomes have declined except for the wealthiest 1%.

The zero tariff modern free traders insist zero tariffs and open markets drive economic growth. The reality has been, all of that growth has occurred outside the US. There are no credible economic studies demonstrating NAFTA, WTO, CAFTA, and other tariff reducing agreements have delivered a net positive benefit to the US economy. History shows the periods of greatest economic expansion in US history have occurred during periods of high tariffs. Return to prosperity in the US will require the rebuilding of our manufacturing infrastructure. Protectionist tariffs are needed to accomplish this goal.

The founding fathers were much wiser men than the globalists of today. We should follow their example.


31 posted on 11/13/2016 7:46:38 AM PST by Soul of the South (Tomorrow is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I do not see how the so called blue collar Reagan Democrats, who are legion and gave us MI and WI, can coexist in the Republican with the tiny sliver of a minority GOP globalist Free Traitor™ hacks. The are mortal enemies. One group needs to be purged, I say give the numerically insignificant yet over represented globalists the boot.


32 posted on 11/13/2016 7:48:08 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

I don’t know who you are but you’re the best poster on Free Republic. My only complaint is you are gone most of the time.


33 posted on 11/13/2016 7:53:12 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Talk of political purges and ominous declarations in capitals undermine your case. Moreover, free trade is not the entire problem and in some respects is not the real problem at all.

I recommend that you take a look at the economic literature on the roles of export led industrialization, currency manipulation, and high levels of US taxes and regulations in the decline of US manufacturing. And as a basis for optimism, cheap natural gas due to fracking may radically benefit the cost calculations that underpin US manufacturing while Trump era reforms reduce the regulatory and tax burden.

34 posted on 11/13/2016 8:41:07 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
I recommend that you take a look at the economic literature on the roles of export led industrialization, currency manipulation, and high levels of US taxes and regulations in the decline of US manufacturing.

I have. I suggest you look at the role of global labor arbitrage as the real reason for off shoring. You may learn something.

If I have to choose between sanctimonious Free Traitors&!513 and the Reagan Democrat blue collar workers of America I will choose the legion of Reagan Democrats every time. Really there is no common ground between Free Traitors™ and the protectionist. One has to leave the party. I say the globalist can go pack sand.

35 posted on 11/13/2016 9:30:35 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Cheap labor is not the be all and end all of global industrial competitiveness. Traditionally, the US had and was determined to preserve the advantage of higher labor productivity. That takes capital investment and labor flexibility, yet high taxes and union work rules tend to discourage both.

In contrast, China's government run financial system channels its citizens' savings into industrialization and infrastructure, while a lack of unions makes the Chinese workforce unusually adaptable -- if often badly exploited. And, to return to a key point, entirely apart from such practices, China's policy of currency depreciation is part of what keeps their labor cheap.

36 posted on 11/13/2016 9:49:22 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Great article! Buchanan states it brilliantly. I sure hope that Trump and his people read and embrace this.

posted by Mr PeachyKeen


37 posted on 11/13/2016 11:24:11 AM PST by PeachyKeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeachyKeen

Bump.


38 posted on 11/14/2016 4:16:04 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson