Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scythian_Reborn
This should be illegal.

There is a disturbing trend on FR toward restricting 1st Amendment Free Speech rights since Trump has won. Remember, whatever is done by you can be done to you. Support Free Speech. (To the extent those people have been told to cease contact and still do, harassment laws address conduct, not speech.)

9 posted on 11/16/2016 8:16:58 AM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SSS Two

No, messing with electors should be illegal, period. I am all for banning conservatives from doing this too, it’s a government process and these folks are being threatened physically, by death, the death of their kids and so on. I have read the reports, this is vicious and messing with electors should be illegal.


12 posted on 11/16/2016 8:19:08 AM PST by Scythian_Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two
There is a disturbing trend on FR toward restricting 1st Amendment Free Speech rights since Trump has won.

I'm not sure that this type of activity falls under the "Free Speech" category. From what I am reading, these people are harassing the Electors at home, on line; everywhere. To me this crosses the line from 1st Amendment speech to stalking and intimidation. The way things are going (riots, violence against Trump supporters, calls for assassination of the President Elect and the rape of his wife, etc) , if I was one of the Electors, I would seriously fear for my, and my family's well being should I vote for Trump when the time comes.

In fact, I'm going to go out on a limb and publicly say, here and now, that at least one Elector, or more, will be physically attacked, if not killed, after the Electoral College meets.

24 posted on 11/16/2016 8:26:36 AM PST by Turbo Pig (To close with and destroy....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two

Is harassing and threatening witnesses and jurors now also free speech? They’re interfering with a federal process, using threats, harassment, intimidation. If it isn’t illegal yet, it should be by yesterday.


37 posted on 11/16/2016 8:36:18 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two
Which part of the Constitution do we wish to uphold? The Free Speech clause or the Electoral College with electors being free to vote their consciences?... and frankly, their intended allegiances.

Lobbying or advice is one thing. Open harassment is quite another.

41 posted on 11/16/2016 8:42:23 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two; Scythian_Reborn

Thank you for posting this.

When we try to play both sides, we become hypocrites like the Democrats/liberals. Let’s not do that.

No, let’s not try to make this illegal. Let’s combat this legally. For one thing, let’s make it very public what kind of dirty tricks Hitlery is STILL up to.

I do agree that democrats who support this are enemies of the US Constitution. But we knew that already.


42 posted on 11/16/2016 8:43:54 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two

There is a disturbing trend on FR toward restricting 1st Amendment Free Speech rights since Trump has won. Remember, whatever is done by you can be done to you. Support Free Speech. (To the extent those people have been told to cease contact and still do, harassment laws address conduct, not speech.)


To say something should be illegal is like saying, “we need to enact a law because some people are abusing the principles of our society. “


43 posted on 11/16/2016 8:44:38 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (these protestors are not anarchists. They are Hillary Supporting Demoncraps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two

Harassment has never been protected speech. You may be an ITG (Internet Tough Guy) but a lot of the people who have volunteered to serve as electors are not. They deserve to right to go about their lives unmolested by dhimmocrat criminals.


50 posted on 11/16/2016 8:57:24 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two

There is a disturbing trend on FR toward restricting 1st Amendment Free Speech rights since Trump has won.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I don’t know where you’re getting that from.

Electors should enjoy the same type of legal privacy that grand jury members do. Not having that sort of privacy allows the sort of vindictiveness and possibly violence that we may see in this case.

These leftists don’t give half a damn about the law or honor or the Constitution. Theirs is a will to power, and the only reasonable way to counter it is via strong law that is enforced.


51 posted on 11/16/2016 8:57:58 AM PST by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two
There is a disturbing trend on FR toward restricting 1st Amendment Free Speech rights since Trump has won.

You have no 'First Amendment Free Speech Rights' on a privately owned website, troll.
76 posted on 11/16/2016 9:48:51 AM PST by farming pharmer (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two

The only thing these democrat-thugs are doing is to strengthen the reserve of those electors to stand by their guns. In a third-world country they would be killed in order to scare them into doing the mobs bidding . . . but 0bama did not quite succeed in his goal to transform us into one of those banana republics.

I didn’t think we would survive 8 years of the Kenyan . . . but by God’s grace . . .


97 posted on 11/16/2016 10:44:11 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two
There is a disturbing trend on FR toward restricting 1st Amendment Free Speech rights since Trump has won. Remember, whatever is done by you can be done to you. Support Free Speech. (To the extent those people have been told to cease contact and still do, harassment laws address conduct, not speech.)

We should cultivate an attitude of total war when it comes to Democrats, since, whether we do it or not, the Dems will do it to us first chance they get.

129 posted on 11/16/2016 6:35:18 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two

Committing voter fraud and browbeating somebody to change their vote is not a right.


134 posted on 11/17/2016 6:19:45 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SSS Two; Scythian_Reborn

Free speech is one thing, this is harassment. There are legal limits on free speech such as harassment, threats etc.


135 posted on 11/17/2016 10:42:47 AM PST by reaganaut (I'm looking forward to Trump as President. I'm an Evangelical and I vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson