Internet is Obsessed With Bizarre Hillary Clinton ‘PizzaGate’ Conspiracy Theory

Heatstreet ^

[Strac6]

Great line!

[Faith65]

What is your field of law?

[Freemeorkillme]

To be clear. This is another pic from James Achilles Alefantis:

[Daffynition]

AHAH. So this is where he keeps them...

[Freemeorkillme]

???

[TigerClaws]

Where is that photo from?

[Daffynition]

Roman catacombs of San Callisto, Rome 100AD-199AD one of the many catacombs five are regularly open to the public.

[Daffynition]

Skeletons [in closet] ???

[Strac6]

I once said “We give advice and counsel on important business issues where the entity we represent has a high personal as well ad financial stake in the outcome of a matter.”

My current answer is “Litigation avoidance”

The real answer is probably “Smart Ass”

[Pete]

Just explore. Click the trending hashtags. #speakfreely is a good one. Follow people. And post honestly.

[DeathBeforeDishonor1]

[TigerClaws]

[kingpins10]

I know because I have a friend in federal law enforcement. For a few clues, go back and look at all of the allegations surrounding the global economic collapse from a few years ago. Tip of the iceberg, pal.

Good day.

[philman_36]

Unless you have proof/evidence how do you know crimes have been committed?
I know because I have a friend in federal law enforcement.
So what action has your friend taken? Has he filed in court against her? Where is the indictment?

Once again, without action isn't it just supposition on his, and your, part?

As for me? I think she's guilty as hell of numerous crimes. My evidence...

Additionally, the Archivist of the United States has stated that the system used to create the record should not affect an agency’s determination as to whether information qualifies as a record. For example, when federal employees use personal e-mail to conduct official business, the communication is considered a federal record. 11

11 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Presidential Records in the New Millennium: Updating the Presidential Records Act and Othe r Federal Recordkeeping Statutes to Improve Electronic Records Preservation, 112th Cong., 1st sess., May 3, 2011, pp. 35-37, at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112hhrg70518/pdf/CHRG-112hhrg70518.pdf.

I'm not in federal law enforcement like your friend so I'm pretty much going with my own suppositions and understanding of the law. (starting with, for one...44 U.S. Code Chapter 31 - RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES)
Note 44 U.S. Code § 3106 - Unlawful removal, destruction of records
Note...timeline. Pub. L. 113–187, § 4, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2009.)

BEFORE 2014...you have to go back to 1984. 44 USC Ch. 31: RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES

2014 — Pub. L. 113–187 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:
"The head of each Federal agency shall notify the Archivist of any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records in the custody of the agency of which he is the head that shall come to his attention, and with the assistance of the Archivist shall initiate action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records he knows or has reason to believe have been unlawfully removed from his agency, or from another Federal agency whose records have been transferred to his legal custody. In any case in which the head of the agency does not initiate an action for such recovery or other redress within a reasonable period of time after being notified of any such unlawful action, the Archivist shall request the Attorney General to initiate such an action, and shall notify the Congress when such a request has been made."

There was a whole damn bunch of impending going on from the get go.
Guilty as hell in my book, and I haven't even gotten to 18 USC.

[Pete]

Epstein.