Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brucedickinson

The presence of non-white people is not the driver of white births or deaths. The statistics in this article were NOT comparative; they considered only the white population.


2 posted on 11/30/2016 5:40:56 AM PST by Tax-chick (Fidelito es muerto! Muerto, I say, at LAST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick; brucedickinson
Tax-chick :" The presence of non-white people is not the driver of white births or deaths.
The statistics in this article were NOT comparative; they considered only the white population"

Consider the source - "Time" is a globalist publication with an agenda. The study, itself, is accurate.
Why should any population increase when they know the government is lying about unemployment, and there is a dirth of jobs ?
Manufacturing is dying in the USA, and encouraged by the FED, we have become a service society, and that does not create income, it merely spreads it around.
There is no motivation to increase numbers or perogeny; parenting is considered a liability, rather than an asset, except in some minority populations.
We are funding failed schools in the public sector, which are actually indoctrination centers for progressive/liberalism/socialism .
Where is the incentive ?
Loss of family income, dysfunctional school systems, lack of opportunity, loss of manufacturing jobs,etc.- now you tell me what is the upside (?)
and why should I have more kids that I can ill afford on my limited income, with increased taxes, and has more liabilities than a productive future ?

70 posted on 11/30/2016 9:33:37 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson