It’s Time for Honest Talk about Muslim Immigration

National REview ^ | November 30, 2016 | David French

[ConservativeDude]

They won’t attack anyone, they won’t participate in terrorist plots, and they abhor terrorism.”

Well, two out of three ain’t bad.

[DoodleDawg]

Extreme Vetting and Deportations. Let the Exodus Begin.

How would extreme vetting stop this guy from getting in?

[SJackson]

Good luck with that; the enemedia won’t even refer to the recent attack as “terrorism” - they’re trying to sort out whether or not it qualifies.

Yes, they're whitewash "terrorism" by stating there's no direct connection to a terrorist group. What that leave us with is a "domestic" terrorist radicalized in his Mosque. In the US. Like a number of recent attackers. They won't like truth either.

[kearnyirish2]

They openly redefined the term; small consolation to the victims...

[wastoute]

Try taking an orange from Arizona into California...

[katana]

Of course no Democrat wants a terror attack to occur

That is not a given. If it will advance their power and control many of them will consider the loss of American lives a necessary sacrifice. You see, sacrificing other peoples' lives is one of their specialties.

[BuffaloJack]

We need to follow Hungary’s example. Get rid of the muzzies that we have and don’t let any more in.

[junta]

French and his other weakling cucks, all but enabled the effeminate left in dominating this country with hysteria over “isms”, “ists” and phobias. French is the problem

[ari-freedom]

If Rubio won, does anyone think NR would have this article? Would they be part of a #neverrubio movement because he was soft on islam and illegals? Noooo

[montag813]

David French is a despicable traitor. His articles should be banned on FR.

[generally]

They (NRO) are low on my list of who/what I will read, but I will still embrace any good ideas they have. This article has some good ones. Being wrong about Trump doesn’t make them wrong about everything. (Even liberal democrats can theoretically be correct sometimes. If I ever notice an instance of that, I’ll let you know.)

I agree with the previous post, that deportation also needs to be discussed. I don’t see how you can have an honest discussion without that.

[Uncle Miltie]

Hey! National Review!

You’re a DECADE LATE!

[lakecumberlandvet]

Honestly, deport the muslims that are here and prevent any more from coming. Incompatibility is the reason. And the fact that many of them want to kill us.

[iontheball]

These self declared “Never Trump” know-it-alls just can’t stop babbling. They are now in the ‘I hope he fails’ mode and they can’t wait to say they told us he would fail. I hate these self-described “true Conservatives.” They will never have any credibility in my world. Every time they run their mouths they can’t help but cast their remarks on Trump in condescending tones. Levin started his schtick the day after Trump won the election by proclaiming he was ready to hold Trump accountable at every turn, as if Trump could give a damn what Levin and his ilk say or do. Levin and NR, by their own actions, have become a small irrelevant gaggle in a new dawning Trump America.

[The Toll]

It isn’t Trump they despise, it’s us.

[SgtHooper]

Honesty has nothing to do with it. Libidiots are inherently self-centered, parasitic, and dishonest. A fruitful sit-down is impossible.

[JimRed]

It’s Time for Honest Talk about Muslim Immigration

Can't do it; TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH!

[Jacquerie]

For a deer-in-the-headlights response, ask a random senator, “Which is more important, your reelection or saving our nation from the koranimals?”

[B4Ranch]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfmywzjdtRM

The majority of Muslim Refugees would rather be in Syria under Sharia Law than in America.

[iontheball]

It isn’t Trump they despise, it’s us.
________________________________________
Yes, you are right. Trump is the embodiment of us so criticizing him is the same as criticizing us.