Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ReformationFan

Inner city population explosion?


26 posted on 12/03/2016 7:06:54 PM PST by Rebelbase (Gatlinburg wildfire: over 1000 homes and business damaged or destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rebelbase

A number of things appear to be poised to change simultaneously under a Trump regime. If so: government welfare will recede and/or be assigned to states; charity (as in private donations, not administrators of government welfare) will increase. Charity conducted this way has the ability to preach the gospel, or even if not the gospel, sane self respect and community respect messages.


28 posted on 12/03/2016 7:11:14 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Rebelbase

No, especially not if welfare is reformed.
And I think we need to reform welfare to say that if you’re on the dole in any form, you have to take long term contraception that can be removed when you’re off the dole - for every female of child bearing age in the house. No point in giving Mama birth control if the teenager can still get pregnant.
We have IUDs that we can implant for $1000 and get 99.99% effectiveness for ten years. That’s cheaper than birth control pills over the same period and you aren’t relying on the person to take them and do so correctly. Liberals shouldn’t whine about this, since it doesn’t mess with hormones or their sacred breast feeding.
Then there are injectable contraceptives like Depo Provera or implants like Norplant.
Change welfare to say “you need free housing, SNAP, utility discounts? You’re too poor to afford another baby, and society can’t support you AND another mouth to feed”. And if they marry a man who can support them or raise themselves out of poverty, they can have the implant out. Using a long term, serious method also solves the problem of the 20% of the population literally too stupid to manage their own fertility.
This is a low cost method to reducing the dependent population that encourages marriage, doesn’t mandate abortion, reduces the population that is mentally unfit to contribute to society and doesn’t rely on those who can’t manage their own affairs to take pills.
Nor is it eugenics per se because the lazy SJW with a high IQ and low IQ woman with 8 kids on welfare would both be required to contracept. And both could get their fertility back if they got independent financially.


61 posted on 12/03/2016 8:09:13 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson