Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 198ml; All

People, you need to understand that under Sharia a Muslim who kills non-believers is considered differently than anyone who kills a Muslim.

A Muslim may only be killed for a specific number of causes under Sharia ... and defending the lives of non-believers, or even your own life, is NOT one of them (unless, of course, you are Muslim).

This is not a trivial matter with Islam. Major Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, was deathly concerned that he might be inadvertently involved in the death of another Muslim (apart from the specific circumstances that Sharia permits) if he deployed and he tried to alert his superiors to the conflict. Why? Because for a Muslim to kill another without right is a one way ticket to Hell.

He “became militant”, which is really a misnomer because all he was doing all along was taking his faith and Sharia Law seriously, because of this.

Which is to say that he was a ticking time bomb should he ever be pushed into circumstances that would set him off.

You may note that he was actually far more ethical a Muslim than the Muslims running amuck in Iraq who were going around killing all sorts of Muslims without right. He was not a morally bad man as he understood morally bad men to be. He was trying to be a morally upright Muslim and THAT is the problem.

This momma is making a statement in line with what Islam teaches her, in line with the way that the OIC defines many terms (which when people ignore or are ignorant of those definitions that they use are misled to think that they mean one thing when they may mean something entirely different) and THAT is the problem.

Islam cannot be reformed. It is law, government and religious commandment inseparably. Anyone who thinks it’s only the last is just fooling themselves.


43 posted on 12/04/2016 5:44:43 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne
This momma is making a statement...

What statement? In this article the words are from someone else! The woman herself isn't quoted, someone else is saying "these are her words".

That's hearsay, not a statement!

44 posted on 12/04/2016 5:51:19 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

Excellent points. As someone who has lived in the Muslim world, I can attest to the madness that grips their minds, which is incomprehensible to the Western mindset.


57 posted on 12/04/2016 9:58:52 PM PST by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson