States should have iron-clad laws on who can and who can’t demand a recall.
The idea Jill Stein can demand one from here position, is just nutty.
Hillary is using her for cover. Look what it is doing to Stein. Her own party has disowned here. Her political career is over.
If this isn’t a great example of how the Clintons have operated for the last 30 years, I don’t know what would be.
People who do things for the Clintons, wind up financiall destroyed or dead, sometimes both.
My understanding is that anyone meeting the requirements for the presidency can run for the presidency, and that they can run as candidates from their own freshly minted political party. So, the Xzins Party can run Xzins.
Apparently, that gives me the right to demand a recount of an election. And if the interpretation that it can disenfranchise a state of its electoral votes is correct, then that means anyone with a beef can pretty much try to prevent a state from certifying its electors on time.
That is a crazy system.
How many people here want to bet me that EVERY single state is looking long & hard at the structure of their recount procedures?
First-—NO state or it’s taxpayers should have to pay a single dime for these recounts. IF a candidate wants a recount—THEY should pay for every single cost.
The time period where any recount can be asked for has to be tightened up.
Then the method recounting has to be secure in scope—not vague.
There are Fed timelines & these recounts cannot keep going on past those deadlines.
The problem isn’t a counting problem......
It is a problem when poll workers are hiding in a ‘secret room’ & filling in absentee ballots as fast as they can do so.
Also- the voter rolls need to be started over-
There are too many ‘voters’ rgistered who are not eligible to vote.
I have a plan. It is too long to retype here.
Go to thread 3498841 & to post #44. Let me know if there is anything you would like to add. Feel free to pass that plan on to anyone you choose. Thx.