Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is J&T Packing Company, Inc. (Clinton Foundation Related; Vanity)
Pizpeadia ^

Posted on 12/06/2016 11:16:25 PM PST by TigerClaws

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: TigerClaws

whoa...click on Chelsea Clinton in that document.
Then check out the addresses of the various companies.
It gets curiouser & curiouser.


21 posted on 12/07/2016 4:31:13 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Interesting story about Bethlehem steel...who the heck beleives in co-incidence when it comes to these people ? Who knows how all this ties into PizzaGate

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/11/10/the-steel-mill-fire-that-reminds-us-why-donald-trump-won.html

In the meantime, some 900 workers from the now shuttered Bethlehem Steel plant who had developed cancer had come to suspect their illness was related to uranium rods they had handled unknowingly during the Cold War. They sought aid from the government for decades before they finally were able to prod Congress into action in 2000.

Under the legislation, workers were eligible for up to $150,000 in compensation. The hitch was they had to prove that they had been exposed to radiation and that it likely caused their cancer.

But the workers had not even been informed they were handling uranium, much less issued radiation badges. And no effort had been made to monitor their exposure. They were being rejected one after another when then Sen. Hillary Clinton stepped in to help.

22 posted on 12/07/2016 4:58:39 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Someone showed up to say the information is false and planted there.

No telling.

Hope someone at the FBI is looking into all this stuff. 30 companies and money shell came. I have no clue if it’s another ‘conspiracy theory’ or some Clinton nonsense.

Would seem odd they’d have everything so obvious and out in the open like that. Odd to the point of stupidity.


23 posted on 12/07/2016 5:22:47 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
> whoa...click on Chelsea Clinton in that document. Then check out the addresses of the various companies. It gets curiouser & curiouser.

She probably has no clue she's listed as an officer for many of the shell companies that are used to shift funds around for the Clintom Foundation. It wouldn't surprise me one iota if Hillary had Chelsea listed as an officer as a proxy for her so she could access to information or documents and forged her signature in the documents. Shell companies don't have to have a sign hanging outside their business. It's common for attorneys to list their own address as that of the corporation for $$$; often it's because they are the registered agent but I've also seen them listed as proxy officers to keep the real officers names out of the articles of incorporation and annual public information reports. The main reason a lot of shell companies are set up is to get the FEIN they need to set up bank accounts so they can transfer funds to other accounts. Often there's a network of them so it makes tracing the wired transfers a lot of fun, especially if they have specific accounts set up for different functions (operating, payroll, taxes, etc...)

24 posted on 12/07/2016 6:05:22 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: exnavy; WENDLE; Liz; yoe; left that other site; Albion Wilde; PROCON; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; ...

FYI


25 posted on 12/07/2016 6:42:40 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

whoaaaaaa jackpot time....!!Great catch!!!


26 posted on 12/07/2016 7:54:50 AM PST by rodguy911 (Go Sarah go! America home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Thanks for the tip!


27 posted on 12/07/2016 8:08:27 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Would seem odd they’d have everything so obvious and out in the open like that. Odd to the point of stupidity.

You mean like having a secret server in your bathroom? Forget stupidity, we're dealing with the "hubris that effs up everything it touches" here!

28 posted on 12/07/2016 8:24:14 AM PST by To Hell With Poverty (I support a woman's right to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty

At least part of their mo is sticking it to us in the light of day.The rest of course is midnight legislation.


29 posted on 12/07/2016 9:50:28 AM PST by rodguy911 (Go Sarah go! America home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

“”Bharara has also been retained by the incoming POTUS, a man known for thinking moves ahead. Watch out Clinton machine. Time is running short.””

He’s a U. S. Attorney - how can he be retained by the incoming president? What’s the source for this?


30 posted on 12/07/2016 10:28:13 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Bharara is the source: http://nypost.com/2016/11/30/bharara-accepts-trumps-offer-to-stay-on-as-us-attorney/


31 posted on 12/07/2016 11:46:19 AM PST by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

Gotcha’...whole different meaning of the word “retain” - he’s “staying on” as US Attorney. Good news!!


32 posted on 12/07/2016 4:15:48 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; ...
Check out Article, ... and, ... Comments.

A lot of info here.

33 posted on 12/07/2016 4:37:29 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

The President can replace any US Attorney. Bush only asked that 8 be replaced. Either Clinton or Obama replaced all of them.

There is a difference.


34 posted on 12/07/2016 7:50:43 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

GWB got rid of only a few and the media went nuts while Clinton had gotten rid of all of them without a mumble from the media. I don’t remember what obozo did - I TRY not to think about him - HA!!


35 posted on 12/08/2016 11:01:42 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

We got it straightened out - “retaining” was the term used when it meant “staying on.”


36 posted on 12/08/2016 11:03:51 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson