Posted on 12/06/2016 11:16:25 PM PST by TigerClaws
whoa...click on Chelsea Clinton in that document.
Then check out the addresses of the various companies.
It gets curiouser & curiouser.
Someone showed up to say the information is false and planted there.
No telling.
Hope someone at the FBI is looking into all this stuff. 30 companies and money shell came. I have no clue if it’s another ‘conspiracy theory’ or some Clinton nonsense.
Would seem odd they’d have everything so obvious and out in the open like that. Odd to the point of stupidity.
She probably has no clue she's listed as an officer for many of the shell companies that are used to shift funds around for the Clintom Foundation. It wouldn't surprise me one iota if Hillary had Chelsea listed as an officer as a proxy for her so she could access to information or documents and forged her signature in the documents. Shell companies don't have to have a sign hanging outside their business. It's common for attorneys to list their own address as that of the corporation for $$$; often it's because they are the registered agent but I've also seen them listed as proxy officers to keep the real officers names out of the articles of incorporation and annual public information reports. The main reason a lot of shell companies are set up is to get the FEIN they need to set up bank accounts so they can transfer funds to other accounts. Often there's a network of them so it makes tracing the wired transfers a lot of fun, especially if they have specific accounts set up for different functions (operating, payroll, taxes, etc...)
FYI
whoaaaaaa jackpot time....!!Great catch!!!
Thanks for the tip!
You mean like having a secret server in your bathroom? Forget stupidity, we're dealing with the "hubris that effs up everything it touches" here!
At least part of their mo is sticking it to us in the light of day.The rest of course is midnight legislation.
“”Bharara has also been retained by the incoming POTUS, a man known for thinking moves ahead. Watch out Clinton machine. Time is running short.””
He’s a U. S. Attorney - how can he be retained by the incoming president? What’s the source for this?
Bharara is the source: http://nypost.com/2016/11/30/bharara-accepts-trumps-offer-to-stay-on-as-us-attorney/
Gotcha’...whole different meaning of the word “retain” - he’s “staying on” as US Attorney. Good news!!
A lot of info here.
The President can replace any US Attorney. Bush only asked that 8 be replaced. Either Clinton or Obama replaced all of them.
There is a difference.
GWB got rid of only a few and the media went nuts while Clinton had gotten rid of all of them without a mumble from the media. I don’t remember what obozo did - I TRY not to think about him - HA!!
We got it straightened out - “retaining” was the term used when it meant “staying on.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.