Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

exactly, but we shall see.


8 posted on 12/07/2016 6:04:37 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: going hot

Or else, suddenly the USSC will say whoa, only civil liability ought to apply here and we have imposed cruel and unusual punishment. A shielding precedent for the private sphere.


9 posted on 12/07/2016 6:06:05 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: going hot

This will be decided under the Trump justice department, so it will be handled differently.

If both were accidental and not gross incompence of some sort, then I’d prefer the one imprisoned be exonerated and compensated in some way.


12 posted on 12/07/2016 6:06:59 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson