You’re welcome. We’re not in a very exclusive club. Afaik, there isn’t a single published Obama researcher who questions the fact that Stanley Ann and baby Barry relocated to Seattle in Aug ‘61. (By published, I mean everyone from big names like Jack Cashill, who has written a book re exposing fraud, to the countless less-famous authors whose work is posted on such sites as WND and American Thinker.) Conservatives have been uncovering and documenting Obama’s lies and scams for around a decade, now, but no one has made an official/published case to the effect that Stanley Ann didn’t turn up in Seattle and take classes at UoW. Rather, it’s acknowledged that she did.
[Note: Leftist/Progressives have not denied she was there, but they’ve quibbled about the timing. In a futile attempt to at least partially validate the Dreams acct, all the earliest Obama/Stanley Ann biographers claimed she didn’t turn up in Seattle until early ‘62.
Then came David Maraniss. He’s hardcore Left, and a massive Obama fan. Nevertheless, he’s a world class researcher. When he wrote definitively, unequivocally, that Stanley Ann moved to Seattle in Aug ‘61, the liberal debate ended. Maraniss’ reputation is such that no one disputed his findings. The Left simply, to a large degree, boycotted his book, as payback for his exposure of their ‘first black POTUS’ as a wholesale liar.]
What apparently happened was that Obama himself didn’t know his mother moved to Seattle in Aug ‘61. Therefore, he wasn’t able to pass that info along to Ayers, who wrote Dreams. When research documented and verified the move, there was a scramble to salvage some piece of Obama’s famous, ‘improbable love,’ story. As has been posted, the women who knew SA back in Seattle tried hard to make the narrative fit Dreams, but in the end failed miserably. Fortunately for Obama, the Leftist press almost completely ignored the humiliating invalidation of his signature work. Had this happened to a conservative, the MSM would have written a thousand stories about it...while still in the warmup phase.
History is replete with examples of people who didn't run with the herd, who diligently worked for years on their thesis, many of whom were burned at the stake for their revelations. You do our research no harm by your accusations, rather, you illustrate that you are unable to think for yourself or see what is there, right in front of your nose. You mention Corsi. He's a good example. He's questioned that baby-sitter a number of times. He knows she's lying. And it's really that simple. If she, as she stated twice, babysat a child in January 1961, that child wasn't zero, and his mother was the Anna Obama shown in the directory. Because in January, 1961, if Stanley Ann was the mother of any child, she would have had to conceive while she was still in high school.
I went to a FR thread given to me by little jerimiah. The first post was 4/11/2011 and the last post. #2191, by jane long, was on 12/17/2016. I saw lots of debate about Stanley Ann’s enrollment at the U of W and her presence in Seattle. It was hard to wade through all the comments. Much of it hinged on the phone book listing of Stanley Ann as Anna Obama and the wild conclusions that went all over the map. One comment doubted that Stanley Ann even was the real mother and that baby Zer0 was adopted. The birth certificate situation was an effort to hide the fact that Zer0 was adopted and his entire history was a fabrication.
You will see some of the FReepers on that thread as you find on this one.
If your eyes are strong and want to take the time going through the whirlwind, you can check out the thread here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2702976/posts?q=1&;page=2101
Fantasywriter, you are listed as on the ping list from that 2011 thread! This debate has gone full circle.