That was Stanley Ann in Washington. Occams razor applies here. So simple. A beloved smart teen, only child of doting parents, gets knocked up by an older married black man. In 1960! Of COURSE she is removed from society in order to have the baby and give it up for adoption. And at her commie high school in Seattle, back then, all the girls in trouble went to one of two unwed mother homes in Vancouver. Period. So easy to figure out. Of course the Dunhams didn’t want their precious brainy child to ruin her life.
The rest is so easy to figure out. No need for all this intrigue.
Thank you for summarizing it so well. I agree one-hundred-percent.
oh come on, Yaelle, you can do better than that. You can’t believe that Stanley Ann Dunham discussed having ‘her baby’ adopted out in APRIL 1961 before it was born...
And if she had, why would that information be redacted on one document, and truncated, so that we can’t read the name of the mother, on the other?
Leaving those documents intact would only have helped to perpetuate the myth, wouldn’t it?
Not a scrap of evidence she was in HI in 1960 or 1961.