[DoughtyOne]

Number one:

Woods DID NOT seek to trash the family or state he would try to harm or ruin them. He focused on the jack ass who slandered him. I applaud him for doing it.

Number two:

This attorney of the defendant is a great example of why most folks think attorneys are lying sacks of cow ‘stuff’.

Number three:

Making it clear you can’t state that people are cocaine addicts when they aren’t, is a very important point to make. Going after the guy’s estate is a great way to drive that home.

If I were Woods, I’d get judgement and donate it back to the family.

The precedent would be set, and the family would not be harmed.

If the guy was well healed, then I might temper that with a sizeable taking, leaving a major portion for the family.

[LouAvul]

It's "well heeled."

[tumblindice]

Unless you’re a limey, there’s no ‘e’ in judgment.
Senor Grammar Nazi

“Correct a man’s grammar, he’ll hate you forever”

[sten]

There’s no reason to protect his family.

The dems have never spared the family of their target. Follow their example

[Stentor]

If I were Woods, I’d get judgement and donate it back to the family.

Family needs to be reduced to spending the winter under cotton blankets on steam vents while begging for fast food scraps. That's deterrence,